I dig this movie. It may not be as beloved as "Avengers" or "Guardians," but I do think it's a bit more inventive and charming. Instead of the movie hinging on destruction of a city, the finale of the movie shrinks down to a child's playset. Also, the story center's around a heist. It shows the potential of what genre's Marvel can play with.
I found Paul Rudd's character to be very charming and likable, without having to be obnoxious…
(Let's see If I can go through this whole interview without mentioning a 1968 science fiction masterpiece by name.)
Christopher Nolan is one of the most ambitious directors working today in Hollywood. His themes are ambitious. His stories are ambitious. His vision is ambitious Hell, even his tracking shots are ambitious. After a while though, his films could start to feel the same. What makes Interstellar stand out from his other films is the (not so strong) emotional journey.
Movies and magic go hand in hand. The best magic trick is where you doesn't question how the trick was pulled off, but how awe inspired you are. The same goes for movies. Méliès was, after all, a magician turned filmmaker who used many of his tricks to create special effects for his films (You've all seen Hugo).
Alfonso Cuaron is not a Director, but a Magician and Gravity pulls of a spectacular and emotional trick.
The visual effects are…