Goddammit, SEE NO EVIL 2. I'm the one dude on the planet who's been asking for eight damn years why there's been no sequel(s) to the cozy, paint-by-numbers slasher-non-classic SEE NO EVIL. Why aren't they making one of these dumb things for every single hulking wrestler, I would ask. I'll gladly pay to watch every one of 'em! And still, I asked so little when the sequel finally arrived.
There's no gore (okay...precious little gore), no nudity, no anything. All…
BIRDMAN: Inarritu's feelings are really hurt from everyone laughing at BIUTIFUL. Undeniable electricity but too often feels like a tantrum.
Also, it's no fault of her performance, but every scene with Emma Stone is a never-ending dead zone.
Also, why does Edward Norton disappear from the last third of the movie?
63 (Feels like I need to go this high for its pure cinema aspects, but this could plummet over time.)
This is overachieving for a shit-flying-around type movie, but I couldn't help imagining the Verhoeven version where Cruise gets savagely ripped apart in graphic detail 800 times. Anyway, not optional.
Question: What's up with the simulated mimics in the *training* room breaking people's backs. Isn't that a waste of soldiers?