Rewatched Oct 14, 2012
Charlie Derry’s review:
For the final film in a trilogy, it can't be faulted. I thought by this point I would be bored of the premise but being filmed back to back with Part II means that it's much the same of what we loved about the first two films. It's far from being the best in the trilogy, but it's not a boring western as I expected it would be and it certainly gives a decent finale.