Every film that has ever been nominated for a Razzie Award in any category.
The greatest legend of all was real.
Alexander, the King of Macedonia, leads his legions against the giant Persian Empire. After defeating the Persians he leads his Army across the then known world venturing further than any Westerner had ever gone all the way to India.
Since we don't actually know what ancient Macedonians sound like let's each pick a different accent!
I see Angie's gone with the "crazed gypsy accent" while Mr Farrell went with the "vaguely European mumble accent", Val decided on "mostly Californian" and Anthony went for "jolly old British".
"Directed by Oliver Stone"
Are you EVER.
"Music by Vangelis"
Is it EVER.
There are some interesting ideas in the 'Revised' final cut of the film and Stone does have a bold and grand vision for the story, but the execution of those ideas just doesn't work as well as he may have hoped for.
Three re-edits later and the movie still cant survive it's often boring script and messy narrative structure. The casting is also off at times, most notably with Farrell, who tries to give it his all, but just doesn't have the screen presence or grandeur to pull of such a huge role. The movie also contains so much screaming! why do all the characters yell all the time?
I respect Stone's passion for the project and the film has a few highlights here and there, but overall it's just trying to do too much at all once.
Watched "The Ultimate Cut," which, my GOD—cerebral camp. And I mean that as the highest compliment.
The Ultimate Cut.
Speechless right now.
Alexander: Revisited is the final cut from Oliver Stone of his Magnus Opus Alexander.
Over 30 minutes longer (214 minutes) than the theatrical cut this is much better, the added scenes actually do add something to the movie and with the new opening the movie seems more structured.
The battle at Gaugamela is portrayed as realistically as possible as is the battle in India where war elephants meet the Macedonian phalanx. Both battle scenes were impressive, very impressive.
From there the film goes at an almost break-neck speed back and forth in time to fill in Alexander's past and to develop his unbelievable conquering spree into the far reaches of Persia, Asia and India.
The cast is overall impressive, even…
There are minor spoilers below for those unfamiliar with the story of Alexander the Great.
I don't know what to make of this movie. I have always liked reading about the philosophy of past great leaders, and Alexander the Great is definitely one of them. Many movies have been made to retell the significent events in their lives, but few have actually delivered. Unfortunately this adaption is one such movie.
I think they stayed pretty true to his character. There weren't really any extra unnecessary scenes with the sole purpose to further glorify him. It shows his early life where he met Hephaistion and other people who would later become his generals. It shows his big victories where he started…
There are precious few films that I give up on mid film and just call it a loss. This ponderous Oliver Stone pile is one of them.
Theatrical release: Stone’s meandering, 175-minute epic will try your patience and your bladder. If you're looking to scratch that biopic itch, instead watch Robert Rossen’s 1956 production Alexander the Great, starring Richard Burton. It may be a somewhat static epic, but it makes up for that with excellent production values and a cast of seasoned Hollywood veterans who deliver fine performances. And, at around 40 minutes less than Stone’s bloated production, your bladder will thank you.
Every movie enthusiast is familiar with the feeling of admiring a movie that everybody else seems to despise. Most of us have quite a few of those. I certainly have my fair share, but the movie that immediately pops into my mind in such discussions is Oliver Stone’s "Alexander".
Most critics panned the theatrical version, the box office was a letdown and it even got 6 Razzie Award nominations. This movie was on almost every level a complete failure. Flawed as it was, I did not quite get why. But then again I was only a teenager, what did I know?
In 2007, Oliver Stone released his Final Cut, which he called "Alexander Revisited". I only got around to watch…
Watched the 207 minute Ultimate Cut, which transforms the film from disastrous to at least watchable. The biggest problem remains Colin Farell, who simply looks lost most of the time and can't project the charisma and gravitas needed to convincingly portray one of the greatest military conquerors of all time. This version suggests that, no matter how many times Stone goes back to this well, the raw materials simply aren't there to make the film he wanted to make. Even still, this is unquestionably an improvement on the Theatrical Cut, so if you absolutely need to watch this for whatever reason then I'd recommend this one.
This tries so hard to be a serious historical epic. The problem is Colin Farrell as Alexander. Completely unconvincing.
The Ultimate Cut.
Speechless right now.
I'm a hoarder. Deal with it.
Current number: 1054
Watched: 52% (548 out of 1054)
An on-going collection of the worst films ever made. Even the ones that are so fucking bad, they're not worthy…