Blow-Up
1966 Directed by Michelangelo Antonioni
Synopsis
A successful mod photographer in London whose world is bounded by fashion, pop music, marijuana, and easy sex, feels his life is boring and despairing. But in the course of a single day he accidentally captures on film the commission of a murder. The fact that he has photographed a murder does not occur to him until he studies and then blows up his negatives, uncovering details, blowing up smaller and smaller elements, and finally putting the puzzle together.
Cast
Studio
Popular reviews
More-
This is why you always triple-check your itinerary when planning a long trip. I was looking forward to Blow-Up, not only as my first Antonioni, but as my film from Italy for Berken's challenge. Well, needless to say, I think it's stretching my already-loose rules a bit too far to consider an English-language film set in London as my film from Italy, so consider this a temporary stopover, along with a mistake I'd happily make again.
I'll admit I went into Blow-Up with a vague sense of apprehension, planning on being inundated with mod shenanigans and trippy dance sequences, but was thankfully presented with a thrilling murder mystery instead. David Hemmings is magnificent here as a somewhat-sleazy photographer who accidentally…
-
Is the exploration of reality vs. perception ever boring? For me, it's always been a compelling theme to explore in film. On the surface, Blow-up is a day-in-the-life character study about Thomas (David Hemmings), a playboy fashion photographer who gets wrapped up in a possible murder mystery after he takes some pictures at a park. Even though that's a description of the film that works for people who haven't seen it, there's a lot more going on here. There are many dots to connect and surrealist imagery to decode, but once some thought is put into it, Blow-up is quite the rewarding intellectual exercise.
Early on, it is established that we shouldn't admire Thomas…
-
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
-
Widely regarded as an essential classic of 60s cinema, Antonioni's Blowup comes highly anticipated and whenever I delve into a director's work for the first time I'm slightly nervous about whether or not I'd like it. Without having any idea what to expect other than a rough plot outline since I had already seen De Palma's Blow Out, I was relieved to find that not only is it very accessible, it is also gripping through and through. With very down-to-earth and largely conventional methods, spiced up with excellent cinematography, Antonioni crafted a compelling thriller that is paced brilliantly and delivers big time. Despite the crucial plot point of the suspicious snapshot being introduced fairly late into the film it kept…
-
Κωλοπαίδι-φωτογράφος στο Λονδίνο των mods πιστεύει ότι έχει φωτογραφήσει κατά τύχη μία δολοφονία. Στην πραγματικότητα, η υπόθεση δεν έχει και μεγάλη σημασία. Τουλάχιστον όχι για μένα. Είμαι δούλη (για να μην πω το ά λ λ ο) των στυλιζαρισμένων ταινιών κι αυτή είναι παράδειγμα για το λήμμα.
Α, και για να μην το ξεχάσω, μωρή Redgrave, TI πλάτη. -
Whenever a watch a film that is directed by someone that I'm not familiar with, I get nervous, wondering if I will like their style of direction. And with Blow-Up, I liked Antonioni's camerawork and most of the shots. He certainly knows what he's doing and he's very good at what he does, but the film just didn't do it for me.
The premise is very intriguing: a photographer accidentally captures the commission of a murder. Great. I'm interested. But the biggest problem with Blow-Up for me is the first act. It's very heavy on exposition and just felt like it dragged on and on. Even with Antonioni's excellent direction throughout the whole film,…
Recent reviews
More-
The premise is great but Antonioni makes a meal of the 'plot' - still a slice of pure indulgent 60s excess. It's fun to make a room full of models wait while you randomly buy a propeller.
-
There's a lot to like stylistically, but there are too many meaningless sequences and I couldn't connect to it emotionally. Perhaps I would have enjoyed it more if I were more familiar with 1960s British culture, but this just came off as pretentious to me.
-
For some reason, I LOVE ambiguity. This film does it for me. A little slow and uneventful, but I think that's the point. So is this guy's life. So he unknowingly allows himself to see more than that. That's all I really have to say about it.
-
Impresionistic, allegorical, but futile and frustrating. Needs a second viewing.
-
Hemmings plays a character who likes to think he's seen everything. When discussing the placement of a photo he deems peaceful in the midst of a magazine whose images are generally violent, he is unfazed by the violence and merely thinks of it as a given and something whose effect can be neutralized. He is so accustomed to documenting action that he is almost unable to believe it when he unwittingly becomes a participant in it. After he thinks he's uncovered an attempted murder, his first instinct is to self-aggrandizingly assume he foiled the plot; later, doubting his instincts, the man accustomed to being a documenter and witness of other lives can't for the life of him get anyone to…
-
Is the exploration of reality vs. perception ever boring? For me, it's always been a compelling theme to explore in film. On the surface, Blow-up is a day-in-the-life character study about Thomas (David Hemmings), a playboy fashion photographer who gets wrapped up in a possible murder mystery after he takes some pictures at a park. Even though that's a description of the film that works for people who haven't seen it, there's a lot more going on here. There are many dots to connect and surrealist imagery to decode, but once some thought is put into it, Blow-up is quite the rewarding intellectual exercise.
Early on, it is established that we shouldn't admire Thomas…
-
Whenever a watch a film that is directed by someone that I'm not familiar with, I get nervous, wondering if I will like their style of direction. And with Blow-Up, I liked Antonioni's camerawork and most of the shots. He certainly knows what he's doing and he's very good at what he does, but the film just didn't do it for me.
The premise is very intriguing: a photographer accidentally captures the commission of a murder. Great. I'm interested. But the biggest problem with Blow-Up for me is the first act. It's very heavy on exposition and just felt like it dragged on and on. Even with Antonioni's excellent direction throughout the whole film,…
-
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
-
Meh.