Contact
1997 Directed by Robert Zemeckis
Synopsis
If it's just us, it seems like an awful waste of space.
Contact is a science fiction film about an encounter with alien intelligence. Based on the novel by Carl Sagan the film starred Jodie Foster as the one chosen scientist who must make some difficult decisions between her beliefs, the truth, and reality.
Cast
Studio
Genres
Popular reviews
More-
While I appreciate the attempts Contact makes at grounding its story in realism, thus partly successfully creating a 'this could really happen' feel, it ultimately falls victim to its own best intentions.
The opening act with that 'stellar' opening shot are very good indeed. They lay the perfect foundation for an intriguing story with excellent acting and a nicely fleshed out protagonist.
The second act forcefully hammers home the point that we are watching an intellectual film, forgetting to tell an interesting story. It clumsily deals with big issues by having stereotypical symbols discourse, disappointingly losing the plot in the process.
The final act is beautifully shot and actually quite original. It is also completely devoid of any emotional resonance because of the cold and shallow act preceding it, killing off the connection to Foster's character almost completely.
Expertly made, but too uneven to fulfil its potential.
-
Ah, the science vs. religion debate. A debate that has spanned many, many years and will undoubtedly continue to do so. And of all the movies I've seen dealing with this topic, Contact probably does it the best.
The way it does it is by playing it down the middle. One protagonist is the viewpoint of science (logic, physical evidence), and the other is the viewpoint of religion (faith, meaning). With these characters in place, the film is able to ask each side tough questions, and in the end it is able to satisfy both viewpoints. While I've never read Sagan's novel, the film clearly shows that he was loving towards the searchers of truth and respectful to those with…
-
This literally might be my favorite movie... I'm not sure why I love it and realize it has some flaws. But ever since I was a little kid I've loved it.
It probably helps that I loved the book prior to seeing the movie. Or the fact that Jodi Foster just seems so smart and doesn't give a shit what people think. Or maybe it was the first movie that really left me thinking about what could be out there.
I'm not really sure why but I get all wide-eyed when I see it, I'll attribute some of it to childhood nostalgia I guess... But really I think I just get caught up in what the movie stands for conceptually.
-
Truly a great film until the very final moments... In true Shawshank Redemption style it would rather tell us what to interpret rather than allowing us the trust and space to do it ourselves. I love this film, Foster, McConaughey, Woods, et al are all magnificent and the story it picthed at just the right one of making the incredible credible and an unbelievable situation and circumstance believable.
So why, in that final moment does it barf all over the 2 and something hours of hard work its put in by telling us something that, without knowing, would be far more powerful.
Ahh well... at least Zemeckis learnt his lesson with Cast Away which by contrast has one of the best, most thoughtful endings ever.
-
One of the more widely overlooked Robert Zemeckis films, "Contact" shouldn't be dismissed when debating the more daring and thought-provoking science fiction films.
It had been at least a solid ten years since my last viewing of this film, and having wider knowledge of all aspects of films than I did when I was 18 really helped me appreciate deeper the themes that take place here. Those looking to be entertained by special effects and rousing action will be mostly bored with this movie, because Zemeckis boldly opted to make a science vs. religion summer blockbuster, and for that it earns admiration points. There aren't many movies this risk-taking coming out of Hollywood at all, let alone in the middle…
-
The end of Contact presents the idea that in the end, no matter if your a person of science or a person of religion, all you will have to support your beliefs is faith. I like this concept. What I don't like is the rather horrible effects in the film.
Recent reviews
More-
¿Cómo es que apenas me voy enterando de esta película? Esto es ciencia ficción dura. Probablemente una de las mejores que he visto del género.
-
Good adaptation of Sagan’s novel, which I read last month. A film of ideas.
-
Ah, the science vs. religion debate. A debate that has spanned many, many years and will undoubtedly continue to do so. And of all the movies I've seen dealing with this topic, Contact probably does it the best.
The way it does it is by playing it down the middle. One protagonist is the viewpoint of science (logic, physical evidence), and the other is the viewpoint of religion (faith, meaning). With these characters in place, the film is able to ask each side tough questions, and in the end it is able to satisfy both viewpoints. While I've never read Sagan's novel, the film clearly shows that he was loving towards the searchers of truth and respectful to those with…
-
---
-
I do love me some good sci-fi. Shame I had to wait almost 2 hours until the final act to get any. The first part of the film is intriguing, as we see Foster's character struggle with the biggest question of all; why are we here? In her quest to finding out the answer, she embarks on lonely journey.
One could argue that the film is as much about religion as it is about Science. The discussion of God throughout the film is one reason, when she reconnects with her deceased Father at the end, this could be "Paradise" how she got there may have been a message from the Gods, rather than extra extraterrestrials.
All makes for good discussion.
Contact is about 25 minutes too long, with a second act that is hollow and cumbersome it really disconnects from the films finale.
-
I've yet to read Sagan's novel by the same name, so I can't really make even a light comparison as my only experience with the story is cinematic. I've always liked this movie, and I think that may be because of it's realistic approach to explore the societal struggle between science/empirical evidence and religious faith, and how it would pan out if a civilized society such as our own came into contact with someone or something extra-terrestrial. The only part I didn't really like was the ending, which sort of tells you how to interpret it instead of allowing you to come to a resolution on your own.
-
The end of Contact presents the idea that in the end, no matter if your a person of science or a person of religion, all you will have to support your beliefs is faith. I like this concept. What I don't like is the rather horrible effects in the film.
-
Nominated for an oscar, yeah right.. 150 minutes of mediocracy, I usually like this kind of movies but this one never got in contact with me.
-
Truly a great film until the very final moments... In true Shawshank Redemption style it would rather tell us what to interpret rather than allowing us the trust and space to do it ourselves. I love this film, Foster, McConaughey, Woods, et al are all magnificent and the story it picthed at just the right one of making the incredible credible and an unbelievable situation and circumstance believable.
So why, in that final moment does it barf all over the 2 and something hours of hard work its put in by telling us something that, without knowing, would be far more powerful.
Ahh well... at least Zemeckis learnt his lesson with Cast Away which by contrast has one of the best, most thoughtful endings ever.