Diner
1982 Directed by Barry Levinson
Synopsis
Suddenly, life was more than French fries, gravy, and girls.
Set in 1959, Diner shows how five young men resist their adulthood and seek refuge in their beloved Diner. The mundane, childish, and titillating details of their lives are shared. But the golden moments pass, and the men shoulder their responsibilities, leaving the Diner behind.
Cast
Studio
Popular reviews
More-
It's nearly impossible to watch Diner without thinking about George Lucas' American Graffiti; however, I personally prefer the former. It is a sort of coming-of-age film set in the nostalgic 1950's, set up in an episodic narrative, with many overlapping plot points and conflicts. The characters were developed well enough to make this seem like more than just another throwaway comedy. Moreover, it's got some of the most clever, insightful dialogues I've observed in movies lately. It does get a bit goofy at points, but this is hardly a setback. In all actuality, it's probably impossible for me to dislike a film that features a scene discussing the importance of music records.
-
A cool cast to hang out with.
-
Wonderfully observed, free-flowing stream of wit, camaraderie, and pointed insight.
-
Seriously good, like Mean Streets, except less violent.
-
Barry Levinson's directorial debut, working from his own original script, is one of those movies that examines a group of friends at a significant moment in their life. Diner focuses itself on several college-aged boys in 1959 Baltimore, caught in that awkward stage right on the cusp of manhood. Each prominent member of the group is stuck at a crossroads between life as a carefree teenager and having to move into the adult world; Eddie Simmons (Steve Guttenberg) is days away from his wedding, Shrevie Schreiber (Daniel Stern) is in a young marriage to Beth (Ellen Barkin), Boogie Sheftell (Mickey Rourke) is a playboy working at a beauty shop, Timothy Fenwick (Kevin Bacon) is a developing alcoholic living off his…
-
While I dislike the lack of Diner scenes in the second half of the film, I do dig this a fair bit. The first half is lots of fun, but the second is a bit all over the place. I actually like this film more because of what it could have been, than what it actually is. I'm a big fan of food, I like Diners and I like talking about meaningless stuff. I think a remake that centers more on the Diner moments would appeal to me. Anyone have a spare twenty million and Steve Gutenberg's phone number?
Recent reviews
More-
This movie takes place in the 1950's. It was fun to watch but it felt more like a documentary than a comedy. It was interesting to see these people living their lives, but there was no real story there. It was good though, I did enjoy it.
-
for some reason I thought I would be into this, but then I realized while watching it that I could have easily lived my entire life without seeing this movie and everything would have been fine.
1 star because it's not a bad film. I just wasn't into it. I watched some of it with only 1 eye because I really didn't need to watch it with both.
PS Kevin Bacon was making a weird pee-wee herman voice, ew
-
Wonderfully observed, free-flowing stream of wit, camaraderie, and pointed insight.
-
100% Meh.
-
Great cast and script. Very entertaining.
-
Why It’s Essential — Though slight in comparison to other classics, DINER effectively evokes a specific cultural moment with strong writing, direction, and performances.
Why You’ll Want to Skip It — If the personal crises of the characters sound more grating than insightful.
-
It's nearly impossible to watch Diner without thinking about George Lucas' American Graffiti; however, I personally prefer the former. It is a sort of coming-of-age film set in the nostalgic 1950's, set up in an episodic narrative, with many overlapping plot points and conflicts. The characters were developed well enough to make this seem like more than just another throwaway comedy. Moreover, it's got some of the most clever, insightful dialogues I've observed in movies lately. It does get a bit goofy at points, but this is hardly a setback. In all actuality, it's probably impossible for me to dislike a film that features a scene discussing the importance of music records.
-
Barry Levinson invents the "doing nothing" genre that crystallized in the 1990s. The movie is ostensibly about some high-school chums heading out for a big ball game, but that never happens--and not much else actually does; which is the magic of this film. The characters feel lived in, and the relationships feel real.
-
The characters' personalities are clear and working from their first scene, a rather startling achievement in development that, like most of Levinson's films, lapses into melodrama all too quickly. Mickey Rourke and Kevin Bacon give the most noteworthy of performances, unfortunately, an informal lead perspective is given to the oh-so-dull Tim Daly and the big "Best Man" speech is put into the mouth of the oh-so-out-of-place Paul Reiser. Daniel Stern has rarely been this muted or natural and Steve Guttenberg has rarely given a good performance (although, miraculously, he does - in this film). Diner starts out with an arcane, nostalgic bang, as almost entirely (what Graham Greene would refer to as) an entertainment and, as it loses steam, begins to feel more and more like a tragedy is building. When nothing comes - and everything is still building to something, we wonder what it is: a freeze framed picture before the credits. Lousy surprise.