You all rock. Thanks for introducing me to so many great people and great movies. What's the best movie you've…
How far would you go to win the ultimate job?
The final candidates for a highly desirable corporate job are locked together in an exam room and given a test so simple and confusing that tension begins to unravel.
Well this was a surprise! Exam, directed by Stuart Hazeldine and a film I'd never heard of before.
The film centres around 8 candidates for an important position in a mysterious corporation. This is the final test as all 8 are seated in a room and given an exam paper and a few simple rules. The papers turn out to be blank and the tension begins to build in the room as the candidates become confused and desperate to be the one to find the answer to this conundrum as the clock ticks down.
This fresh and original film took me by surprise by how good it was as I had set myself rather low expectations. The whole film is…
Question 1: What should you watch if you're in the mood for a low-budget thriller?
This movie has it's problems. Some really flawed logic, cliche writing, bad acting...But I've never been a fan of sound logic. What this movie does is hold your attention. It's a quick, 1 hour and 40 minute movie that doesn't take a whole lot of concentration to follow but still lets you feel like a genius when you solve the riddle.
8 people, 1 room, 80 minutes to answer the final question to get the dream job they all hope to receive. Just one problem: what is the question?
Is it possible to make a low budget movie about 8 people in a room interesting and entertaining? Absolutely yes!
This psychological thriller is tense and mysterious and has a great atmosphere, and especially in the first 80 minutes you are wondering what is going on.
The acting overall was great with Luke Mably as the star of this movie as White.
If only the final 10 minutes would have had the strength of the previous 80 minutes this would have been a master piece.
Like found-footage, the single location genre is one that I pretty much enjoy no matter how shitty the film. Exam is no different. It has a ridiculous amount of plot holes, the acting is laughable, and the ending is worse than a high school play. But, lo, I still sorta dug it.
I guess that means I dig high school plays.
Exam is a flawed but fun little mystery that has enough original ideas behind it to keep it going pretty nicely for the most part - but then predictably doesn't know what to do with its ending.
An opening credits montage of each of the candidates sets things up very impressively indeed, and although it has to fight past two or three pretty sub-standard performances, a delightfully slimy and smart-arsed Luke Mably and a suave effort from Jimi Mistry cancels these out.
Far from perfect and with one or two gaping plot holes (they have some pretty strange interpretations of 'don't ruin your paper') but still pretty good.
Eight candidates make it to the final round of the selection process of a certain mysterious organization. They are all kept together in one room, given a piece of paper and pencil and are asked to figure out the answer in 80 minutes. Wait, figure out what exactly? Well, that's the question. Stuart Hazeldine's Exam has a very promising start. Having already set up an interesting scenario, the movie puts us and the characters in a confounding situation where we have to figure things out from scratch. But where to begin? Are the candidates allowed to interact? What are their limits? How will they react under pressure? Is there really any solution? Or just a hoax, a trap?
Boasts a great concept that's fairly well executed. It's not an easy task to keep a film that has only one setting intriguing, but Exam does it pretty effortlessly.
8/10: Brilliant and masterfully done! Keep me engaged throughout and trust me when I say you will watch the movie, again immediately after the first time
I really enjoy these types of films where the entire thing takes place in one setting and this one was no different.
Exam has a nice, mysterious premise and is se in real time so it feels like we are right there with the characters. Although it gets a bit tedious in the last half hour, it still manages to be an enjoyable movie, but not the very best example of this genre.
Watched with Simpson at Millennium Tower
Simple, yet questions the definition of morality. It is incredible how it portrays the world within the confines of a room, leaving chills in my spine. Pity that the ending was somewhat anti-climatic.
Un film con temática de enigma que, aunque no siento que está muy cuidado, entretiene. Mas en la linea de El Método y La Habitación de Fermat que Cube y 12 Angry men.
Interesting, full of twists, although some felt a little forced.
This full movie is taken inside a exam room.For example 12 angry men
but this was not equal to that movie..
This movie is one time watchable..
Parafraseando a Los Suaves de Pobre jugador (muy apropiado, teniendo en cuenta que la película pertenece al subgénero de las competiciones puñaleras): "Como piedra en su caída / así fue esta cinta / hacia abajo sin poder parar".
- The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward…
- Human Traffic
- Come and See
- Holy Motors
- Rear Window
- 12 Angry Men
- Panic Room
- The Breakfast Club
A few films that take place primarily in one confined setting, ratcheting up the tension and forcing characters to confront…
- The Eagleman Stag
- Eveready Harton in Buried Treasure
- Eyes Without a Face
Each week I'll post a new letter and all you have to do is nominate a film that you think…