Movies that are slightly off.
Aflame with the excitement and emotions of tomorrow!
In the future, an oppressive government maintains control of public opinion by outlawing literature and maintaining a group of enforcers known as "firemen" to perform the necessary book burnings. Fireman Montag begins to question the morality of his vocation. Curious about the world of books, he soon falls in love with a beautiful young member of a pro-literature underground - and with literature itself.
“The only way to be happy is for everyone to be made equal.”
It is a serene community. Low-slung houses, uniform of appearance, line the streets. Reed-like trees keep visibility at a maximum. Earth tones dominate the color palette, except for the occasional vermillion box with a blue light on top so as to catch the eye of would-be informants. Within these homes, bored civilians watch large flat-screen television sets from which talking heads issue assurances of social harmony. To and from work, one takes the train, taking care not to speak to fellow passengers. It all seems rather ordinary. Except that everyone is always stroking themselves and their clothing, an apparent epidemic of rather reserved heavy petting. The human…
Review In A Nutshell:
Fahrenheit 451 follows the story of a world where books are forbidden by law and firefighters are present to ensure they are perished via fire, and one firefighter starts to have second thoughts about his profession.
The first thing came into my mind when watching this film is the similarities this film has with A Clockwork Orange and Brazil, the similarities is found in its visual atmosphere, creating this dystopian environment, but what makes this film different from the two films I mentioned is its dystopia is found internally within its characters. The physical environment that these characters live in are actually close to home, aside from a couple of "improvements" like the wall screen. Truffaut…
"You're not living - you're just killing time!"
Film #5 of NoeHat's Scavenger Hunt Challenge-- a film with a number in the title!
Guy Montag's world doesn't exist; it couldn't exist. How could anyone be able to read at all in a society that anathemizes the printed word? How are all the complicated electronics built without manuals and blueprints and physics textbooks? How are records maintained with nothing but numbers and photographs?
But guess what? Big Bad Wolves and gingerbread houses don't exist either. This world's very un-reality forces us to compare the details to our own reality.
Consider: The first thing I do when I wake up is look at my phone or tablet. Then I turn on music…
"We're a minority of undesirables, crying out in the wilderness. But it won't always be so. One day we shall be called on one by one to recite what we've learned. And then books will be printed again. And when the next Age of Darkness comes, those who come after us will do again as we have done."
Okay, I just finished a second viewing today, thinking especially about the ending scene with the Book People.
The New Testament says, "The Word of God is living and active". That's a good picture. For me, it isn't that the Book People have fallen into a conformity of their own (though outwardly that may be how it looks). I see the film as a fairy tale. The fact that these Words are moving around, walking from place to place means they are alive. They can't die just because copies have been burned. They thrive. And they survive.
Adaptation to film of novels that are so intrinsically about books doesn't (or shouldn't) really make any sense. Francois Truffaut's first colour film, and his only in English, overcomes this hurdle well, adding some distinctly cinematic touches to add extra depth to the already strongly thematic source novel.
What makes the films of the French New Wave is the eternal desire for experimentation. Although the playful use of unconventional techniques is not as prevalent in 'Fahrenheit 451' as in Godard's similar 'Alphaville', it still gives the film energy that it would otherwise lack. A particularly nice, subtle touch was the initial titles being spoken, hinting to the abolition of books and writing in general that is the main focus of…
"Every book burned enlightens the world," says Emerson. François Truffaut in London’s Pinewood Studios, uneasy with the language but with Nicolas Roeg’s camera and Bernard Herrmann’s violins on his side. As in Godard (Alphaville) and Losey (The Damned), the Future is Now: Ray Bradbury’s visionary regime is recognizably a mid-Sixties English tangle of antennas and wall screens, with both kook and conformist played by Julie Christie. Society has become somnolent and onanistic, pacified by pills and TV programs ("brothers" and "sisters" are too intimate terms for the zombies, the state addresses them as "cousins"). The word has been banned, books are forbidden and tracked down; firemen once extinguished pyres, now they’re the crypto-Nazis providing them. Oskar Werner is one of…
What a strange edition to Truffaut's oeuvre this was. While it's certainly not a complete failure, one must recognize how miscast Werner and Christie were in their roles. If you can ignore those two, there's much to be enjoyed in this one.
i really love oskar werner
I would love to see a remake of this movie some day.
σημ.: Fahrenheit 451 η θερμοκρασία στην οποία καίγεται το χαρτί.
Decent adaptation of an excellent dystopian novel. Truffaut's basically the wrong guy for the job, but tries his best. Julie Christie and Oskar Werner sell the movie though IMHO.
I think my soul just died a little. What would the world be without books? Any kind of books, novels, philosophies, poetry, short stories, manuscripts, screenplays? Without text to narrate to us different world, theories, ideologies? An adaptation of a novel by Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451 brings the audience to a world without text, and into a life of man whose world began to change when he began to read.
Read the rest of my review here
The score by Herrmann is good, the production design is very good, and it's adapted from what was my favorite novel in sixth grade, so I was obviously really captured by the plot. However, I think what kills it is British stiffness. The dialogue is pretty lifeless, there aren't a lot of interesting style choices with the camera, and the pace is way too slow. By the end of 2 hours, it just gets old. Stick with the book.
You like books eh?!
Really fantastic designs, and I think it captures the book's sense of the power of the written work. Truffaut has some great ideas about how to film burning books in a dynamic way.
I kind of hate to say it, but Oskar Werner is a huge problem here - I think the part requires someone who has a natural warmth playing it cool as fireman and then letting the warmth slip out...Werner is very cold though, and he stays cold.
I want to do this in honor of Hoop-tober hosted by Cinemonster, but I don't want to make it too…
This list is the Letterboxd version of The Oxford History of World Cinema.
The book celebrates and chronicles over one…