• Matt Thomas

    ★★★★ Rewatched by Matt Thomas 15 Sep, 2014

    Deliciously wicked. Camp, funny, gory in places, with a very watchable cast. It's only Tennant that doesn't fare as well in the edit. Hugely enjoyable.


  • radiomanhead

    ★★½ Added by radiomanhead

    Lo mejor es la primera parte donde esta bien manejado el suspenso con el lado cómico que tiene también la versión original, Collin Farrel realmente lo borda y me parece que deja muy mal parados a los actores juveniles.

    Una vez que el caza vampiros entra en acción la película a mi parecer pierde todo fuelle, la parte cómica se torna tonta y sin gracia, el suspenso desaparece para dar paso a una acción mas bien chusquera, una lastima porque…


  • Victor Krause

    ★★★½ Watched by Victor Krause 05 Sep, 2014

    Ya know what? It's fun. And Colin Farrell is mega weird in it, which makes it awesome.



    ★★★½ Added by KMOKLER

    Not a bad remake actually pretty fun with pretty fun performances.


  • witchyhellbroth

    ½ Added by witchyhellbroth

    i should honestly give this zero stars but hey points for trying i guess???? TERRIBLE REMAKE god awful not even farrells hot brows could save this


  • Plueschie

    ★★★★ Added by Plueschie

    David Tennant (and Colin Farrell).
    I've got nothing more to say.


  • Ben Dugan

    ★★★½ Rewatched by Ben Dugan 23 Aug, 2014

    I would argue this is just as good-if not better- than the original. Anton Yelchin is an excellent Everyman hero and David Tennant is great as Peter Vincent. But the movie belongs to Colin Ferrell. He is obviously having a blast with the material and delivers one of his strongest performances,
    Not perfect by any means but well worth a viewing. Underrated and under seen.


  • Toni Roig

    ★★★ Rewatched by Toni Roig 21 Aug, 2014

    [English/ Spanish review]

    Part of the "Dad, let's watch something scary together" (again)

    My daughter asked me to re-re-watch it again with a friend, and we had a very good time indeed. I still prefer this version to the original in some ways (forgetting about the silly 3D effects, which fortunately are not too annoying): the movie retains the main bits of the original story, with a bleaker tone and a very solid cast, from the 'serious characters' (Anton Yelchin,…


  • Zach Evans

    ★★★ Rewatched by Zach Evans 16 Aug, 2014

    An inferior remake (duh) that still manages to do enough new things to keep itself entertaining. All the gore from the first one is replaced with terrible looking cgi, and the cautious, subtly threatening Jerry is replaced by a dude who blows up houses and punches through cars. The main saving grace here has got to be the Peter Vincent character again, who has been smartly reimagined for the modern era from a washed up old Vincent Price-esque actor into…


  • MatthewLB

    ★★★½ Watched by MatthewLB 17 Aug, 2014

    This movie was okay.


  • moviedave

    Rewatched by moviedave 13 Aug, 2014

    If you are going to remake a classic eighties vampire movie, then at least bring something new or innovative to the story.

    unfortunately this weak copy brings nothing new to the story.

    Set in las Vegas. Charlie is a teenager with a vampire living next door to him. He seeks the help of a las Vegas showman, peter Vincent ( played by David Tenant, not a patch on the original Roddy McDowall character) who puts on an occult vampire Vegas…


  • Lizzie Mackarel

    ★★★★ Watched by Lizzie Mackarel 11 Aug, 2014

    I did not expect to like this even half as much as I actually did. It's one of the few films that gets the balance between comedy and horror exactly right, and David Tennant is just fantastic.