All the films from all the editions, including those subsequently removed, presently totalling 1187. An easy way of seeing how…
From the Vivid Pages of Charles Dickens' Masterpiece !
A humble orphan suddenly becomes a gentleman with the help of an unknown benefactor.
I’m trying to rationalize Great Expectations in my childhood timeline. It was grade 7, so I think I would have been about twelve years old. We had to read it that year, and I hated it. I It was old, it was boring. As a ‘treat’ the old 16mm projector was wheeled in and a film version of this novel I despised was shown one afternoon. I hated it too. It was old, it was musty, it was full of cobwebs and funny accents and everything else that didn’t interest a twelve year old space nut. I had seen 2001:A Space Odyssey four years before, and that was my tiny minds idea of thought provoking cinema, not some silly story…
Film #10 of Gustav's Recommendations
” Love her! If she favors you, love her, if she tears your heart to pieces, love her!”
Adapting from a classic and well-known novel is a difficult task but when you have a true master like David Lean on board there’s no need to worry. He takes the powerful novel of Charles Dickens and gives us a genuine and decent adaptation, one that is loyal, detailed and precise – perhaps even a little bit too loyal, detailed and precise, it has captured the tone of the book with great success and it’s exactly the kind of adaptation that will tempt you to go and open the novel and read it once again.
Ok I admit....the only Charles Dickens book that I have somewhat read is A Tale of Two Cities. I have heard about Great Expectations...but had not read nor had I seen any of the many film versions. So I went to this movie a Great Expectations virgin. This one is part romance....part suspense....and part mystery. Movie follows an orphan named Pip and follows his story from age 13 to 25. John Mills plays the older Pip....Sir Alec Guinness plays his best friend (this was Guinness' first speaking part in a movie)....Jean Simmons plays the love interest.
The performances are solid across the board....but I actually give the child performers higher marks than the adult performers. This one is directed by…
There was once a time when the thought of watching a Charles Dickens adaptation would be so low down my list of watching priorities that it would be pushing up the daisies.
But these are the days of me sticking on anything old that I can find on the telly or Mubi when I'm at home working, and I figured if it was boring then at least I was right to avoid watching them and that I at least got that experiment out of the way. I know I sound like a completely uncultured bastard and that's alright because I am, and that's even before I talk about my experience with with Dickens' books.
I started reading one, that being…
Embarrassingly my first David Lean film that i've watched intentionally all the way through (I've sat through bits of most of his epics while younger) and part of my girlfriend and I's little Dickens season.
The first half hour or so features some stunning film making, incredibly atmospheric with a great use of locations and sets and making the most of the superb and lasting characters the story provides. The scenes with Magwitch on the marshes and the first visit to Haversham's house particular Estella's treatment of Pip are so very direct and somehow manage to capture the idea of a child being subjected to terrifying half understood events and personalities very well.
It tails off a little when Pip…
Listed among Films Nominated for Best Picture
I read the novel by Charles Dickens in high school, and I know I saw the story screened at least once on television in my teens, although there were a number of productions made between 1953 and 1971, so it could have been any of them ... perhaps the 10-part BBC series that was broadcast in 1967. I do know I saw Alfonso Cuarón's 1998 modern version with Gwyneth Paltrow and Ethan Hawke, which I didn't care for all that much. I like my Dickens more classic, I suppose.
Well, it doesn't get much more classic than director David Lean's 1946 adaptation, It stars John Mills as the main character Pip, Valerie Hobson…
Most people are forced to read this in high school and, like me, hate it due to its length and the intense scrutiny of themes and characters. Since this experience left me with a bad taste of what should have been a literary masterpiece, I was surprised to find the film very manageable. I guess it takes David Lean to take the lengthy work and convert it to an entertaining two hour piece.
miss havisham: *adopts a child and raises her to seek revenge on all men*
miss havisham: "are you not afraid of the woman who has never seen the sun?"
miss havisham: "WHO AM I, FOR HEAVENS SAKE, THAT I SHOULD BE KIND?!"
miss havisham: *burns to death alone, bitter and in her decaying wedding dress*
me: lmao honestly same tho goals
Not my favourite of early (ie., 'pre-epic') Sir David Lean, but still an excellent production from The Criterion Collection's 'David Lean Directs Noel Coward' boxed set. Excellent cast, with probably the finest Charles Dickens' adaptation ever put to celluloid. It's simply THAT good.
David Lean is known for his film adaptations and Great Expectations is definitely one of the best, alongside his other work Lawrence of Arabia. Great Expectations was Lean's first take on Dickens with Oliver Twist following 2 years later in 1948. He was nominated at the Academy Awards for Great Expectations and there are few faults throughout the film. As a fan of the original text by Charles Dickens I knew what to expect, however Lean kept me gripped with particular highlights in the fantastic set design, cinematography and great acting.
It's perhaps not surprising just how middle of the road Lean's depiction of the story is given the period of film Great Expectations comes out of. It is definitely…
Great Expectations is one of my favourite novels and to begin with I was thinking this is by far the best of the three adaptations I've seen. However, Pip ages forty years in six and that really sullies the rest of the film. This distillation is representative of my main problems with the film, namely what it misses out in condensing a fantastic novel. My problems aren't so much in what is shown on screen as what isn't. I understand that things will be lost in the transition from page to screen and that naturally things will get lost along the way, but I think that Lean's film doesn't really handle the Estella & Joe romance very well, partly due to…
A lesson in adaptation in which David Lean's direction beautifully captures Dickensian gothic. The wistful storytelling combined with precision editing creates an emotional sense of time's passage that reaches far beyond the two hour runtime.
Charles Dickens was the bomb. Alec Guinness was the bomb. David Lean was the bomb diggity.
Seriously, sometimes I find it hard to believe how inventive filmmakers were as early as 1940's.
David Lean's magnificent film adaptation of a story I really cannot stand, Charles Dickens' "Great Expectations".
The photography, production design, performances they're all first rate and were enough to keep me attached from the beginning to the very end.
I've mentioned this before in passing conversations that I am not a fan of the "upper class period dramas" that were all over the 1940's/50's and 60's movie scene. When Renoir tried to convice me with The Rules of the Game, I thought it was crap. When Dreyer threw in Ordet for me to watch, I thought it was pretentious and far too slow and grim when it wasn't necessary. And when I tried to watch Fassbinder's Effi Briest, I felt far too detached to give a crap about any of the characters on-screen leaving it very middling and dull. For a while I only thought that Bergman had the magic touch to keep me invested, that was until that…
UPDATED: October 21, 2016
The Criterion Collection is a video distribution company that sells "important classic and contemporary films" in…