Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
2005 Directed by Mike Newell
Synopsis
Dark And Difficult Times Lie Ahead.
Young wizard Harry Potter starts his fourth year at Hogwarts, competes in the treacherous Tri-Wizard Tournament and faces the evil Lord Voldemort. Friends Ron and Hermione help Harry manage the pressure … but Voldemort lurks, awaiting his chance to destroy Harry and all that he stands for.
Cast
Daniel Radcliffe Rupert Grint Emma Watson Ralph Fiennes Michael Gambon Alan Rickman Robbie Coltrane Brendan Gleeson Miranda Richardson Gary Oldman Robert Pattinson Stanislav Ianevski Clémence Poésy Josh Herdman Maggie Smith Geraldine Somerville Matthew Lewis Frances de la Tour Tom Felton Roger Lloyd-Pack
Studio
Genres
Popular reviews
More-
A part of my Harry Potter challenge.
Dark, deadly, dangerous.
This sequel is what I've been waiting for. It's what I hoped for when people told me that it would get darker as I kept watching, but it's what I never really allowed myself to fully believe in.
I loved the whole "3 schools coming together to compete" concept, even if the games are a bit suicidal.
How is it even possible to make such a desirable and beautiful world to live in, but so dangerous you'd be afraid to even enter. I really do admire J.K. Rowling.Robert Pattinson is somehow likeable (yeah, I know, weird), and Daniel Radcliffe managed to act this one out without getting on my…
-
Revisiting the first two films in the series, they weren't nearly as good as I remembered. Looking back at the third, I just forgot how great it was. Looking at the fourth again, it's just as I remember it...terrible. It's so fucking lame. Extra fucking lame. Extra EXTRA fucking lame.
I always thought the fifth film was when my Potter Boner eased down, but now I remember that this was the first film that made me realize Harry Potter wasn't nearly as golden and sacred as me and everyone else on the bandwagon praised it as. This film had so many problems, most of which is this was so fucking lame and corny. This was the point where the franchise…
-
Completely demented and terrifying to be in the same room with... but he's really been there, you know?
Omg there was a few tense seconds when it looked like GoF wasn't going to load, but I took it out and swore at it and now it's working perfectly. SEE, SWEARING AT INANIMATE OBJECTS DOES WORK.
My least favourite book and also my least favourite film probably. I mean, of course both are still great but I am not into that whole Tri-Wizard thing? Anyway, yeah everyone has really long hair in this one and Michael Gambon goes completely off the radar with his understanding of Dumbledore's character (apparently Gambon never ever read any Harry Potter so it kind of makes…
-
Easy come, easy go. Granted, this is the most action-centric of the books, but the slide back into purely expository filmmaking, all empty spectacle and fan-pandering inclusions, is depressing. None of the tasks has any stakes, and the climatic confrontation with a revived Voldemort is the highlight by default, though it too lacks the creeping dread the same scene had on the page, that sense of something catastrophically unstoppable about to occur. And did the actors suddenly get worse? Emma Watson in particular really grows into her deliver-every-line-out-of-breath style that I'd chalked up to young nerves in the first two. Radcliffe trying to sell tears at the end is one of the most laughably uncomfortable things in the whole series. God, so bad.
-
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
-
My journey through the Harry Potter films continues. This one was cruising along at about 3 stars until the graveyard scene with Ralph Fiennes elevated it another half star. I quite enjoy Fiennes when he plays a villain. Brendan Gleeson was good as well as MadEye Moody.
So if you wanna know stats I gave the first two films 3 stars, and films 3 & 4 3 1/2 stars. The third is my favorite so far.
Recent reviews
More-
This was probably the easiest book to convert into film and they did it very well. They nailed a lot of things in this movie - the scene at the graveyard, the first and the second challenges, Mad-eye. I wish the maze was a little bit more than just dangerous plants but all in all, this was great.
-
A part of my Harry Potter challenge.
Dark, deadly, dangerous.
This sequel is what I've been waiting for. It's what I hoped for when people told me that it would get darker as I kept watching, but it's what I never really allowed myself to fully believe in.
I loved the whole "3 schools coming together to compete" concept, even if the games are a bit suicidal.
How is it even possible to make such a desirable and beautiful world to live in, but so dangerous you'd be afraid to even enter. I really do admire J.K. Rowling.Robert Pattinson is somehow likeable (yeah, I know, weird), and Daniel Radcliffe managed to act this one out without getting on my…
-
My journey through the Harry Potter films continues. This one was cruising along at about 3 stars until the graveyard scene with Ralph Fiennes elevated it another half star. I quite enjoy Fiennes when he plays a villain. Brendan Gleeson was good as well as MadEye Moody.
So if you wanna know stats I gave the first two films 3 stars, and films 3 & 4 3 1/2 stars. The third is my favorite so far.
-
It was good but not brilliant as the other Harry Potter's series yet It does get darker then usual I'm not much of a Judge of friends against one friend who didn't anything to change the rules of the Tri-Wizard Tournament but I do like the Hungerian Horntail and I didn't Know That Two Doctor Who actors David Tennant & Roger Lloyd-Park who did the Crouchs in the movie, Voldemort's new face looked a little bit like a monkey's flat face but it does give him more a fearful look & Emma Watson Really Looks Beautiful in pink.
-
I'll go ahead and warn that this assessment is much, much longer than my last, mostly due to excessive nitpicking.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the film in this franchise I am most on the fence with. It obviously takes its cues from previous films and that plays a great role in its undoing. It seems to break away from the first two in being more practical in the approach to the overall school life of Hogwarts; mostly the conduct of both the professors and students, though with the exception of one of the most important scenes in the series, there really isn't any class scenes this time. The classes don’t really have any purpose in this…
-
Una buena parte de la saga Potter. Me ha gustado mucho más que la tercera, a pesar de tener un argumento aparentemente más simplón. Me ha gustado el breve david tennat, roberto paRkinson pre-crepúsculo,.. No me ha gustado la forma de abordar la adolescencia de los protagonistas, tratando de grabar a fuego un conflicto hormonal que algunos no , tienen. No nos engañéis, que Harry es homosexual. que se le ve...aunque es feo, cosa que no encajaría en el prototipo homosexual medio.
Y que decir del pelo leonidas que me lleva...
Un buen primer combate cara a cara con Voldemor also.
Que me ha gustado. 3 estrellas y un pin. -
Not as grand or beautiful as Prisoner of Azkaban, but this is better than the first two. Visually enthrwling and dark throughout, this takes Hary Potter in a very different path that led by its predecessors. This could have been great, if it weren't for the terrible character development and awkward relationships between the three teen leads.
-
unremarkable
-
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.