Every film that has ever been nominated for an Academy Award in any category. Enjoy!
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
Let the Magic Begin.
Harry Potter has lived under the stairs at his aunt and uncle's house his whole life. But on his 11th birthday, he learns he's a powerful wizard -- with a place waiting for him at the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. As he learns to harness his newfound powers with the help of the school's kindly headmaster, Harry uncovers the truth about his parents' deaths -- and about the villain who's to blame.
It's quite nostalgic to revisit the magical world of Harry Potter after so many years, yet surprising to discover that it still has a charming quality about itself. The first in the 8-part film series, Harry Potter & the Philosopher's Stone (also known as Harry Potter & the Sorcerer's Stone) may not have the darkness or complexity of its later instalments but what it manages to retain is the freshness, innocence & excitement one feels when embarking on a new adventure.
Based on the novel of the same name by J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter & the Philosopher's Stone begins the journey of The Boy Who Lived and covers his adventures during his first year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft & Wizardry. Completely oblivious to the…
Fast paced, creative and entertaining! Geared to kids but I managed to breeze right thru it!
My favorite character in this series is Snape ;-) Unfortunately he doesn't receive the screen time that he deserves!
The first thing you get when you revisit the first Harry Potter film is just how bad the kid's acting was. Emma Watson, oh dear. She has got better over the course of the films, but boy was she irritating here.
J K Rowling did have some artistic input into the film versions of her best selling books, and it shows. Recreating exactly what was written on paper and bringing it to life has been a filmmakers biggest challenge over the years and fair play to Chris Columbus here who seems to get almost everything right. It's magical, it's fresh and is a stunning adaptation of Rowling's imagination. A franchise borne to make money, it didn't disappoint Warner Bros. either…
Am I the only one who gets utterly frustrated by those House Cup points and the level to which they are subject to inflation and irregularity over this and all the other films? So I have commenced my Harry Potter marathon to the likes of my girlfriend and I must say that this wasn’t as bad as I remembered. Sure, the lead child actors are pretty amateurish and boring (except for Hermoine and Malfoy), but the adult actors - particularly Snape and Filch - came out strong. If you haven’t read the books, the ending must be very disappointing as it would seem to amount to one big deus ex machina. I thus think the director could have interfered with the original story more; make it less childish as well.
When it comes to modern global franchises, Harry Potter surely has to reign now as one of the main players, given over its collective seven films it's raised enough money to fund the GDP of an average sized nation. After JK Rowling's novel series about the titular boy wizard went stratospheric, appealing to both children and indeed parents alike for balancing youthful magic & a strain of dark, knowing humour, a cinematic adaptation was inevitable. So was born The Philosopher's (or Sorceror's if you're in the US, which makes far less sense) Stone, the first of the Harry Potter series which serves as the origin and introduction to our young protagonist, not to mention launching the careers of Daniel Radcliffe & Emma…
Horrendously dated in terms of its laughable visual effects, poorly acted on every child actor's behalf, unjustifiably overlong, predictable and childish but unbelievably entertaining, enchanting and enduring, the first adaptation of J.K Rowling's whimsical "Harry Potter" novels, directed by Chris Colombus, is a true adventure to behold. Released in the same year as the first installment adaptation of Tolkien's groundbreaking and literature defining novels, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone never fails to entertain, mostly due to the pure adventure/fantasy aspects of the film and the soaring, epic, unforgettable, iconic, everlasting, moving and adventurous score, clearly and most easily the strongest aspect of the film that glues the entire franchise and makes possible the film to be described as magical.…
Strongly scripted, skillfully directed, and well-executed, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone makes for an entertaining and expertly crafted first installment in the legendary saga, with excellent cinematography, great performances, incredible atmosphere, and an engaging story.
22 August 2015 ★★★☆☆ 🔄
NOTE: watched this as *Wizard People, Dear Reader*. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_People,_Dear_Reader
I'm sorry, but the Sorcerer's Stone has not aged well at all. The direction is shoddy and this movie is incredibly overlong and boring. These movies didn't start getting good until around the Prisoner of Azkaban and Goblet of Fire.
I only liked the first Harry Potters because they were kids and it was all cute.
harry potter is my WEAK SPOT
Yup, gonna watch all the Harry Potter films again. Mostly because I have no idea whether I’ve seen 4, 5 or 6 which is really annoying me.
The Philosopher’s Stone (because that is what it’s called) is essentially the Jurassic Park III of this franchise. It’s messy and often ridiculous but really quite fun in spite of itself. Both films also have scenes where a reptile randomly starts talking to our protagonist, so they both obviously win points for that.
It’s almost like this whole film was designed to be loveable through nostalgia; the special effects are charmingly unconvincing while Daniel Radcliffe is genuinely quite awful at this stage and Emma Watson overacts her sweet little heart out. Rupert Grint…
I wanted something nostalgic. Found it.
[after his parents have left, thinking he is ill] "They bought it. Incredible! One of the worst performances of my…
Every film Roger Ebert has given a four-star rating. This is an ongoing project.