I Live in Fear
1955 ‘Ikimono no kiroku’ Directed by Akira Kurosawa
Synopsis
Kiichi Nakajima (Toshirō Mifune), an elderly foundry owner convinced that Japan will be affected by an imminent nuclear war, resolves to move his family to safety in Brazil. His family decides to have him ruled incompetent and Dr. Harada (Takashi Shimura), a Domestic Court counselor, attempts to arbitrate.
Cast
Studio
Genre
Popular reviews
More-
I was really surprised at how good I Live in Fear was. Honestly, I wasn't expecting much from it, but it turned out to be one of Kurosawa's best (second tier, maybe, but that’s great for a Kurosawa film). While Mifune initially seemed wrong for the part, he ended up being very powerful as the head of the Nakajima family. One of my biggest criticisms would have to be the smallness of Takashi Shimura's role. I think he was underused in the film. His character was curious and sympathetic towards Mifune's character, and I feel like I didn't get to see enough of that dynamic. Otherwise, Kurosawa's direction of this was excellent- the pacing was smooth and the camera was…
-
When reviewing this, one needs to remember that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki happened only ten years before. A massive peace movement had been formed in Japan, and Kurosawa's approach to this was to create a satire.
He would later come back to the topic in other films of his with other approaches, and had also probably already touched the subject in Ikiru (1952).
I Live in fear is an important film, but it is presently a bit too difficult to associate with the main character to give the film top marks. Toshirô Mifune, however, is superb in a completely different type of role than ever before. He is an older patriarch who is obsessed by the fear of nuclear weapons. It is not that hard to imagine that this fear hovered like a mushroom shaped cloud over Japan's population during these years, and for our protagonist his obsession gradually turns into fanaticism and madness.
Recent reviews
More-
Kurosawa directs this film concerning a father of a large family with major concerns over the atom bomb and wanting to move his family to Brazil where he thinks with be a safe haven. from this the family debate wether to have him committed. a film that actually comes under 10 years after Japan being Bombed themselves at the end of WW2,
-
I was really surprised at how good I Live in Fear was. Honestly, I wasn't expecting much from it, but it turned out to be one of Kurosawa's best (second tier, maybe, but that’s great for a Kurosawa film). While Mifune initially seemed wrong for the part, he ended up being very powerful as the head of the Nakajima family. One of my biggest criticisms would have to be the smallness of Takashi Shimura's role. I think he was underused in the film. His character was curious and sympathetic towards Mifune's character, and I feel like I didn't get to see enough of that dynamic. Otherwise, Kurosawa's direction of this was excellent- the pacing was smooth and the camera was…
-
Gran interpretación de personaje principal, no se trata de un film menor de la filmografía de Kuroshawa sino de un tema tan áspero que la propia película se desarticula de incorporar cualquier elemento glorioso.
-
This is a pretty tragic film about how one man's fear of impending nuclear holocaust drives him to insanity and ruins the lives of those around him. Mifune starts off the film (in pretty good old man makeup, IMO) as his usual gruff, extremely forceful self but is slowly broken down and withers away. Mifune is great but I liked Takeshi Shimura even more as a 3rd-party arbitrator who settles Mifune's family dispute. Shimura is always impressive because he's able to convey a lifetime worth of sadness in a glance.
My problems with the movie were that it loses focus a bit after the dispute is settled. While the family dynamic is very good, there are simply too many people…
-
When reviewing this, one needs to remember that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki happened only ten years before. A massive peace movement had been formed in Japan, and Kurosawa's approach to this was to create a satire.
He would later come back to the topic in other films of his with other approaches, and had also probably already touched the subject in Ikiru (1952).
I Live in fear is an important film, but it is presently a bit too difficult to associate with the main character to give the film top marks. Toshirô Mifune, however, is superb in a completely different type of role than ever before. He is an older patriarch who is obsessed by the fear of nuclear weapons. It is not that hard to imagine that this fear hovered like a mushroom shaped cloud over Japan's population during these years, and for our protagonist his obsession gradually turns into fanaticism and madness. -
Every Kurosawa film I've seen has been either a samurai film or a modern tale of post-WWII Japan. I prefer the modern stories like this film. It asks if a man who is rational can also be insane, or if you call someone insane can they over time start believing it themselves. Who has the authority of calling someone crazy?
-
This film is unique for it's time because instead of being afraid of Godzilla, he was afraid of the H-Bomb itself and what it would do to him and his family. Is he really insane or does the fear eat him up so much inside that it erases all of his sanity because if think about this film, at the first he is quite sane and wants to be property out of Japan since they already have radiation there, but toward the end when somebody tells him that you cannot escape, that is when he loses what is left of his mind. A sad film that touches on some important topics.
-
Slightly less cinematic than some of Kurosawa's other films but this still remains a highly powerful drama about the all consuming nature of fear in the wake of devastation in that period of time. Featuring a stunning performance from Mifune.
-
A complicated, rich, and multi-layered story that unfolds at a pace befitting its complexities. The film feels remarkably contemporary, thanks in part to the frank manner in which issues are dealt with, and serves as a remarkably effective and engaging critique of nuclear warfare and the psychological and physical effects it can have on society. Through the destruction and dissolution of one family, the film works as an allegory for the effects of nuclear warfare - there are no winners.