Reviews of I'm the Angel of Death: Pusher III 2005
-
Meh. Mit Abstand der uninteressanteste Teil. Fand die Hauptfigur einfach nur unsympathisch. Die Aufräumszenen in der letzten halben Std und die Dynamik mit seinem Bruder waren das einzig interessante. Ansonsten gewohnt beklmmend und realistisch.
-
This one is better than II.
Milo's character is much more empowered and interesting than Tonny. It's a mix up of trying to get straight but being bent. Trying to be nice but being a cunt. Being a cunt to others but being treated like a cunt yourself.
It doesn't really have have the retarded gold chain gangsters that the other two have. I think that's perhaps what I wasn't keen on in the first one. I've no interest in wide boys.
Good shit!
-
I think this is the best in the trilogy and the character of Milo is beautifully evened out, after brief appearances in the last 2 films.
-
1/2013
-
conclusion to The Pusher trilogy, here concerning the business man/criminal from the first film, his dealings with adiction, a drug deal going sour and his daughters birthday. good to see the charactor from that film getting his own story as its warranted and runs well, and as it moves along brings a conclusion that has given a greater view in that world
-
The slightest film of the trilogy, there is less to be said of the third film in the 'Pusher' trilogy but it's still another suitably grubby and droll foray into the world so effectively created by Refn in earlier efforts.
Continuing the idea of taking a peripheral character from the original and contructing a new story around them, we take Milo, the intimidatingly charming villain of the first film, as he tries to deal with his demanding daughter's birthday and…
-
"Pusher 3" es la conclusion a esta fantastica trilogia de crimen, ahora enfocandose en el personaje de Milo (quien tambien tuvo roles menores en las dos anteriores). Aqui vemos a un narcotraficante buscando dejar su adiccion a las drogas pero de nuevo envuelto en trabajos ilicitos que le traeran muchos problemas. Winding Refn ha creado una gran saga que nos adentra a la brutalidad y violencia involucrada en el trafico de drogas desde la perspectiva de sus distribuidores.
"Pusher 3"… -
Who in their right minds would have ever centered a film around the character of Milo. Who cares about his back story and what makes him tick? Refn does and does it extraordinarily well.
-
Being that Milo was the most interesting character from the first Pusher, unsurprising that his perspective was the most interesting and entertaining out of the three for me. Love that Refn chose to humanize a couple of the peripheral characters from Pusher to flesh out his trilogy. This is the same Milo from the first movie, but a bit older and under a considerable amount of strain from various factions interested in taking a piece of his empire for themselves.…
-
Nicolas Winding Refn recalls the same mechanic that worked particularly well for his exceptional sequel, but unfortunately it doesn't bring the same result. The director's authorial stylistics are all present, though rather toned down due to the weakness of the narrative. The concluding part of Refns trilogy is certainly the weakest and fails to match the quality of its predecessors.
-
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
-
For the most part, if I hadn't watched them all so far apart from one another I don't think I'd be able to distinguish between the different installments of this trilogy, but I will say the "meat" of the story will probably stick out more than anything else in my mind for years to come.