Tracy. Lancaster. Dietrich. Clift. Garland. Just look at those names for a second. When a cast is so loaded that you can refer to the top five billed players only by their last names, you're in some rarified air. Then throw in Maximillian Schell, whose performance is better than all of them, and you've got a once-in-a-generation level of acting talent on display. Top it all off with an Oscar-winning screenplay by Abby Mann about a bunch of Nazi fellow travelers getting their legal comeuppance, and we could be debating the film's standing as a masterpiece. And while Judgment at Nuremberg is certainly entertaining and rightly remembered as a top-notch legal drama, its highlights pretty much begin and end with…

Wow...What a film. I was so into this and got lost in the story and characters that the over 3 hour running time felt like nothing. And that's really saying something for me because I usually look at the clock whenever I watch a film that is that long, but I never did for this one. The cast is huge and the story is one we all learned about in history classes back in school.

I thought this film was made at a very interesting time in Hollywood. You have lots of veteran actors who peeked in the 30's 40's and early 50's, but by the start of the 60's you had rebel filmmakers making films that had drugs and…

The start of this film dragged on and I did not care for it; however, as it got in further and more details came out, it caught my attention. By the time that I have written this, it was been a while since I watched it so I cannot recall every actor. There were several of them that were quite notable. In particularly, the German attorney trying to defend the four Nazi judges was noteworthy. So the cast is good.

I liked the camera work as a whole. It was fluid as it moved around quite a bit, even though it is confided into this room. The problem was that it was repetitive as this was more than three hours…

Had i known i was going to be watching 3 hours of courtroom action, would i have decided to give this one a miss? Probably. Would i have made a mistake? Absobloodylutely! The film has a stellar cast, with names like Tracy, Lancaster, Garland and even a young William Shatner. I cannot fault anyone on their performance.

Judge Haywood is sent to Germany after WW2 to put on trial those judges who sentenced people under the Nazi regime. It is his job to decide whether these judges are guilty of anything or not. After all, they were just following the laws laid out my the Nazis. As each separate story and case is put forward, you are left thinking they…

Tracy. Lancaster. Dietrich. Clift. Garland. Just look at those names for a second. When a cast is so loaded that you can refer to the top five billed players only by their last names, you're in some rarified air. Then throw in Maximillian Schell, whose performance is better than all of them, and you've got a once-in-a-generation level of acting talent on display. Top it all off with an Oscar-winning screenplay by Abby Mann about a bunch of Nazi fellow travelers getting their legal comeuppance, and we could be debating the film's standing as a masterpiece. And while Judgment at Nuremberg is certainly entertaining and rightly remembered as a top-notch legal drama, its highlights pretty much begin and end with…