This list is complied from the films mentioned in Jack Lehtonen's Mubi list on vulgar auteurism, the films mentioned in…
Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
A visiting city reporter's assignment suddenly revolves around the murder trial of a local millionaire, whom he befriends.
Part of Graham J's There's Something About Midnight Challenge
“Which conversation shall we join?” “The one least likely to involve gunfire.”
The average daily high temperature in Savannah, Georgia in December is 63° Fahrenheit (17° Celsius), and the average daily low is 41° Fahrenheit (5° Celsius). Light jacket weather during day, warmer coat weather at night, one might say. It is Christmastide 1981 (we know it is Christmas because Jim Williams (Kevin Spacey) is about to hold his annual Christmas party, but we do not realize the year until informed of it much later; only anachronistic automobiles lend a jarring suggestion that the otherwise contemporary-seeming proceedings are in fact historical). Despite the season, everyone is dressed as though it is…
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
Based on a true crime story! What makes this film intriguing has nothing to do with the murder, it has everything to do with its colorful characters!
The flamboyant drag queen Lady Chablis whom just happens to play herself/himself in the film!
Luther Driggers the man whom walked around with flies buzzing all around him (They were attached to him via string)! Oh yeah he also carries a vial full of poison just like he does in the film!
Minerva the local voodoo high priestess!
Mr. Glover the man walking a dead dog named Patrick!
I'm a sucker for strong character driven plots and this film is bursting at the seams with quirky, eccentric characters that add flavor to the film as much as they do in the real world!
This falls into the other two Eastwood thrillers from this period Absolute Power, and True Crime in that they area all thrillers with prestigious casts that suffer from seriously bad pacing. I get a feeling that nobody could tell Eastwood to cut these movies down at this point because all three are over 2 hours, and I think all could do with some serious trimming. Additionally this one has real cohesion problems with the supernatural elements, seeming to come from a different movie than the more traditional courtroom material.
Cast wise we get a typically wonderful performance from Kevin Spacey, and a typically bland turn from John Cusack. Its in the cinematography that this film really misses an opportunity. This…
A companion piece to High-Plains Drifter (and certainly Uncle Clint's most peculiar film since that, considering the number of colourful characters) Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil is a film about Justice. Justice is a rather serious matter to be left completely in the hands of men. Because men have weaknesses. And there might be no river in Savannah to bury their sins and wash them clean, but they seem to have no trouble doing it right under the sun. Εvery once in a while though somebody else intervenes to restore the balance.
This one stands on the side of natural law (lawyer Sonny Seiler's statement that he doesn't know Thomas Hobbes, one of the most enthusiastic endorsers of natural law, is a nice touch). Make no mistake though. Clint Eastwood doesn't defy positive law. He just doesn't trust men who implement it and enforce it.
Quite an odd film from Clint Eastwood, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil makes great use of the sweltering, sweaty Savannah locations, soaked in the mysticism and supernatural-ness inherent in that area. It seemed like it was going to be one type of movie for the first 20 minutes or so, before morphing unexpectedly into a court room drama (unexpected for someone who hasn't read the synopsis, source novel, reviews etc like me anyway). It works though, with good performances from John Cusack and Kevin Spacey, and a supporting cast of eccentric characters including a trans-gender club singer and a man who walks an imaginary dog around the park. It sounds like an absolute mess but bizarrely it works, not completely satisfyingly, but due to Eastwood's assured direction and some top notch acting, it's a strange melange that I enjoyed sampling.
Clint Eastwood's 1997 courtroom drama, based on the best selling novel of the same name, creates a vivid sense of place, the Savannah location giving as much flavour to the film as Kevin Spacey's Southern flamboyance, and John Cusack's Yankee writer. It is effortlessly exploited by Eastwood's classical style, the film is shot with skill when dealing with the exteriors, though the courtroom scenes are a little visually generic. The Southern Gothic style, enlighten by Lady Chablis' amusing effervescence, and presence of voodoo; makes this 150 minute film a really entertaining and engaging film. Interesting, intelligent, well crafted. Eastwood, really.
"I'd rather enjoy not knowing."
Based on the movies of his I’ve seen as a director, Clint Eastwood doesn’t make grand, luscious movies. Sure, he can make big movies, like the companion pieces of Flags of Our Fathers and Letters From Iwo Jima. But even at their biggest, they’re still gritty and dirty and free of pomp. He’s a director with a reputation of coming in before schedule and under budget. Which is why it’s so inexplicable that he made a movie built so entirely on excess, as Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil.
John Cusack is John Kelso, a journalist sent to Savanah, Georgia to write a story for the society papers about a famous, annual party, thrown by local antiques dealer,…
After me and a pal pissed ourselves silly at the fucking terrible Million Dollar Baby, I avoided Clint like the plague. 10 years on I forgave. But, this wasn't good enough to care about and there was no big B-Movie laughs :( like in Million Dollar Baby.
Clint Eastwood mystery/courtroom drama with John Cusack and Kevin Spacey. At 2 1/2 hours, the film meanders but never gets dull or repetitious. The leads are good enough to hold attention especially Jack Thompson as the defense attorney, and the courtroom stuff is engaging.
Quirky crime tale which in the hands of Eastwood comes across as a little lightweight. The only really notable element was Lady Chablis playing herself. She quite simply carried the film.
This a story which screams out for an auteur director adept at weaving dark and light in a more satisfying way. Eastwood manages to stretch himself but not enough to do this bizarre tale justice.
Over-long, generally meandering, and much too slack, Eastwood is unable to either craft a compelling courtroom drama or recreate the eccentric atmosphere of the book. The film has its moments, including the performances of showgirl Chablis as herself and Kevin Spacey as the Southern nouveau riche defendant, but they are too few and far between among missteps such as a invented romantic subplot (which involved a straight relationship, despite the book's author being gay), and the generally flat and uninteresting look of the film, an almost criminal failing given Savannah's beauty.
Nota = 5,5
The Lady Chablis: It's like my mom always said: "Two tears in a bucket, motherfuck it."
John Kelso: I'll have to remember that one.
Great Story Brilliant cast and just really funny quotable lines throughout the movie. I always like watching this movie every single character is a real character. An actor’s dream to play characters like these as they are just interesting and really out there. I can watch this movie again and again a solid 8/10 from me.
Excellent detective story in a "Gone with the Wind" mood. Kevin Spacey as paradigm of Rhett Butler. That's all you need.
Only 5 star films are listed!
I'm pretty sure I forgot a dozen titles and don't ask why some films count and others don't (also the…