Mission to Mars
2000 Directed by Brian De Palma
Synopsis
Let There Be Life.
When contact is lost with the crew of the first Mars expedition, a rescue mission is launched to discover their fate.
Cast
Studio
Genres
Popular reviews
More-
Made a deal with Andrew James of the Cinecast if I rewatched Mission to Mars he would rewatch Red Planet. Clearly, I got the short end of the stick. I have grown to like a handful of DePalma's films, and know all too well how inconsistent he is with the quality he puts out. I remember loathing this film when I saw it in the cinema; now, over a decade later, I am merely seething.
The film does a decent job of depicting Mars, more so than Red Planet, and it pleasures in the afterglow of Kubrick's 2001 with all of the play inside the spaceship. The script, however, is insufferable, eye-rolling on repeat insufferable. The difference between this and…
-
A vanilla but fun science fiction story blended with limp wrist campness; a child's silly yet charming imagination in fruition and transferred directly to screen. The one-note characters can do no wrong, they are just cheeky smiles and starry eyed winks—all traits humorously stemmed from saluting patriotism ("Ammeeerrrica") and pride in quick-dashes of advancement ("space, fuck yeah!). De Palma's flair is sporadic but compelling in effect, giving a high class sheen to match the huge budget ($90,000,000!); an opening 2+minute tracking shot and a revolving spin inside a spaceship (reminiscent of Kubrick, 2001) are the standouts and heighten this melodrama into something more artistic.
Mission to Mars is basically an A-grade B-movie that has enough adventurous wonder to balance out the cheesy shortcomings. Why the ratings are so low is an oddity to me—maybe at release people hoped for more from such a 'blockbuster'? Well 13 years later with no expectations, it satisfies my science fiction itch just fine.
-
"It's why we're here."
the sheer suicidal audacity of the manned exploration of space juxtaposed with spiritual risk of being truly connected to someone or something else, both manifestations of our instinctive need to reach out.
-
One of the few De Palma films I actually enjoy. And one of the most hated for some reason. I sort of admit it to be a guilty pleasure - I've always been a sucker for semi-believable space adventures (The Core, Pitch Black, Solaris, Red Planet, Sunshine). In fact, outside of some of the performances and dialogue, this movie is quite similar to Boyle's Sunshine in many respects.
It's obvious De Palma used Kubrick's 2001 as inspiration for some of the outside shots, though his minimalism could use a little work. But his fusion with some low-budget, sci-fi, B-movie elements of the 40s and 50s seems to really mesh nicely with the updated effects (that REALLY hold up well).
Sure…
-
You have films that are cheesy-bad and you have films that are cheesy-good. This film, to me, clearly belongs to the latter.
Brian De Palma is a director who's films almost every single time ends up cheesy as hell, but there's some unexplainable cinematic joy to them. Mission To Mars feels like what would have happened if you had let Steven Spielberg direct the last part of 2001. Then it's not a bout depth, but about pure joy, silly and adventurous.
What we have here is not really a single plot, but a pastiche of plots that have been strung together into one long, mysterious and grandiose story line. There are some truly great moments in Mission to Mars. This should not be too surprising with the wonderful cast, big budget, and talented production team.
-
Mission to Mars is a fine film in some respects, while simultaneously being utterly forgettable at the same time. In particular the film suffers from boilerplate dialogue and embarrassing product placement (using Dr. Pepper to detect a hull breech). Moreover the characters are astoundingly one note, such as Jerry O'Connell (womanizer) and Gary Sinise (aptitude, dead wife). The ideas introduced in the third act are not entirely tacked on, but they feel unearned due to the preceding 80 minutes.
Despite the scripts problems, the film's strengths rest largely in its technical achievements. The production design, both of the interior of spacecrafts and of Mars' landscape, are excellent, especially relative to the time in which it was made. DePalma's direction is…
Recent reviews
More-
'It's gonna be up to us to get new motherboards, drives and software to Mars as fast as we can!'
Some computer repairmen go to Mars. En route they have many computer-related problems, like a NASA version of Siri that doesn't quite catch what you say first time and a broken-down spaceship that has to be fixed by turning it off and turning it on again. In a powerful climax, one of the tech guys gets things up and running just in time and shouts 'We are online and LOADING SOFTWARE!'
-
Aliens and spaceships why did nobody tell me I should watch this before now....oh yeah cause it is horrible.
Some stuff worked okay but overall i was not impressed with anything in the film and had to force myself to finish it simply so I could confirm what I knew was going to happen.
Stay away from this film.
-
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
-
"It's why we're here."
the sheer suicidal audacity of the manned exploration of space juxtaposed with spiritual risk of being truly connected to someone or something else, both manifestations of our instinctive need to reach out.
-
Este filme é uma possibilidade muito interessante para a origem de toda a informação.
-
Space, drank. Casualty, drank. Mars, drank, Mars, drank.
-
You have films that are cheesy-bad and you have films that are cheesy-good. This film, to me, clearly belongs to the latter.
Brian De Palma is a director who's films almost every single time ends up cheesy as hell, but there's some unexplainable cinematic joy to them. Mission To Mars feels like what would have happened if you had let Steven Spielberg direct the last part of 2001. Then it's not a bout depth, but about pure joy, silly and adventurous.
What we have here is not really a single plot, but a pastiche of plots that have been strung together into one long, mysterious and grandiose story line. There are some truly great moments in Mission to Mars. This should not be too surprising with the wonderful cast, big budget, and talented production team.
-
While the grand ideas of the film amount to little more than an alien Powerpoint presentation, I find an awful lot to enjoy here. Evoking 2010's sense of there maybe being something rather nice about discovering new worlds, though also indulging in tense and terrifically score set-pieces, the whole thing just hits a tone which I thought was rather lovely. Gary Sinise is a little miscast though the rest of the ensemble do well enough but in all, I have fun with this even if it's a little silly.
-
A vanilla but fun science fiction story blended with limp wrist campness; a child's silly yet charming imagination in fruition and transferred directly to screen. The one-note characters can do no wrong, they are just cheeky smiles and starry eyed winks—all traits humorously stemmed from saluting patriotism ("Ammeeerrrica") and pride in quick-dashes of advancement ("space, fuck yeah!). De Palma's flair is sporadic but compelling in effect, giving a high class sheen to match the huge budget ($90,000,000!); an opening 2+minute tracking shot and a revolving spin inside a spaceship (reminiscent of Kubrick, 2001) are the standouts and heighten this melodrama into something more artistic.
Mission to Mars is basically an A-grade B-movie that has enough adventurous wonder to balance out the cheesy shortcomings. Why the ratings are so low is an oddity to me—maybe at release people hoped for more from such a 'blockbuster'? Well 13 years later with no expectations, it satisfies my science fiction itch just fine.