• Michael Stuhlman

    ★½ Added by Michael Stuhlman

    With the first one giving us something more original and the 3rd one being the most interesting it leaves the second one feeling very uninspired and boring. Watch the first then skip to number 3

    View

  • Elizabeth Lerner

    ★★ Rewatched by Elizabeth Lerner 31 Jan, 2015

    This one gets a bad rap, I would say. The film: A, doesn't clearly telegraph all its scares; B, actually engages in some pretty complex camera compositions; C, actually holds them solid instead of constantly switching to handheld like the first film; D, doesn't make its characters so noxious that it's hard to stand them for the length of the movie; E, has an actual climax. It's not good, but it's a step up in sufferability.

    View

  • Chris Alley

    Watched by Chris Alley 24 Oct, 2010

    Actually a prequel, not a sequel to the original movie. Did a good job at tying everything together but I still prefer the first one more.

    View

  • Aahil Dayani

    ★★★ Watched by Aahil Dayani 31 Jan, 2015 4

    Cute baby. Genuine spooks and lots of Katie cleavage. 3/5 would only watch with someone else.

    View

  • Matthew Saponar

    ★★★★½ Rewatched by Matthew Saponar 30 Jan, 2015

    Yeah, this is fucking boring, but when it's spooky, IT'S REAL SPOOKY!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    View

  • AdamG

    ½ Added by AdamG

    I think the whole series is a boring spineless wanna be horror movie, not entirely crap but just a step above retard amateur.
    You know what? You'd be better off watching a porn movie rather than watch this pointless shit. Too bad there are no zero stars cause this one is ever more boring and lame than the first one.

    View

  • Emelie

    Rewatched by Emelie 23 Jan, 2015

    This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.

    The dog makes it.

    View

  • Jason MD-P

    ★★★½ Added by Jason MD-P

    Perhaps better than the first. One of the few examples of a sequel building on the original to not only establish itself in its own right, but to improve upon the original as well. I like how facets of the first were explained, I liked how naturally and effectively security cameras were used combined with home videos to tell the story. I liked how, similar to the first, the tension built slowly and effectively and without much special effects. Very well done. I was expecting MUCH worse.

    View

  • shytea

    ½ Watched by shytea 16 Jan, 2015

    When the budget increase by over 4 million dollars you would expect even an ounce of the talent and creativity of the first film.

    View

  • Cinematic Justice

    Watched by Cinematic Justice 28 Oct, 2010

    I went to see this movie for two reasons. One, because I thought it would be a delightfully appropriate movie as we get close to Halloween. Two, I have never gotten to do the scary movie with my boyfriend thing. Yes, I'll admit it: I would have been perfectly willing to embellish a little to get him to hold me. If the second movie had been anything like the first movie, however, not a lot of embellishment would have been…

    View

  • joelhwa

    ★★ Watched by joelhwa 17 Apr, 2011

    4/10: They should have stop at part 1 and not "franchising" it. It's lame. It also feels like a rush job in order to capitalize on the original's success.

    View

  • Jonathan Davies

    Watched by Jonathan Davies 31 Mar, 2013

    Watched at home on own

    View