• Jamaal121

    ★★★ Added by Jamaal121

    Ultimately a better made than film the first one, although obviously less fresh. The security camera approach removes most of the "Why are they still filming" plot holes, and the building on the mythology of the first film is done well. But there is also a little too much teasing in this one (they pan over security cameras where there's nothing happening, but the movie primes you to look for little things so you don't notice.)


  • David Lawrence

    ★★½ Watched by David Lawrence 20 Feb, 2015

    In a nutshell: I suspect this would have resonated with me more had I seen it in the cinema, disconnected from the real world and sharing the suspense with an audience in the dark. A viewing in my living room with my other half, who crucially had already seen it, found me very disconnected from the material and experiencing it as a rehash of the first film and bringing very little new to the series. I still find the found-footage…


  • Ann-Marie Commons

    ★★★★★ Watched by Ann-Marie Commons 20 Feb, 2015



  • Ben Garnhum

    ★★★ Added by Ben Garnhum

    The second one.


  • Michael Stuhlman

    ★½ Added by Michael Stuhlman

    With the first one giving us something more original and the 3rd one being the most interesting it leaves the second one feeling very uninspired and boring. Watch the first then skip to number 3


  • Elizabeth Lerner

    ★★ Rewatched by Elizabeth Lerner 31 Jan, 2015

    This one gets a bad rap, I would say. The film: A, doesn't clearly telegraph all its scares; B, actually engages in some pretty complex camera compositions; C, actually holds them solid instead of constantly switching to handheld like the first film; D, doesn't make its characters so noxious that it's hard to stand them for the length of the movie; E, has an actual climax. It's not good, but it's a step up in sufferability.


  • Chris Alley

    Watched by Chris Alley 24 Oct, 2010

    Actually a prequel, not a sequel to the original movie. Did a good job at tying everything together but I still prefer the first one more.


  • Aahil Dayani

    ★★★ Watched by Aahil Dayani 31 Jan, 2015 4

    Cute baby. Genuine spooks and lots of Katie cleavage. 3/5 would only watch with someone else.


  • Matthew Saponar

    ★★★★½ Rewatched by Matthew Saponar 30 Jan, 2015

    Yeah, this is fucking boring, but when it's spooky, IT'S REAL SPOOKY!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  • AdamG

    ½ Added by AdamG

    I think the whole series is a boring spineless wanna be horror movie, not entirely crap but just a step above retard amateur.
    You know what? You'd be better off watching a porn movie rather than watch this pointless shit. Too bad there are no zero stars cause this one is ever more boring and lame than the first one.


  • Emelie

    Rewatched by Emelie 23 Jan, 2015

    This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.

    The dog makes it.


  • Jason MD-P

    ★★★½ Added by Jason MD-P

    Perhaps better than the first. One of the few examples of a sequel building on the original to not only establish itself in its own right, but to improve upon the original as well. I like how facets of the first were explained, I liked how naturally and effectively security cameras were used combined with home videos to tell the story. I liked how, similar to the first, the tension built slowly and effectively and without much special effects. Very well done. I was expecting MUCH worse.