Red Riding: In the Year of Our Lord… Red Riding: In the Year of Our Lord 1980
2009 Directed by James Marsh
Synopsis
Police corruption interferes with the search for a killer in Yorkshire, England. Based on David Peace's novel "Nineteen Eighty".
Popular reviews
More-
Second of the trilogy and I'm pretty sure I am never going to West Yorkshire as the police there scare the shit out of me. Another intense affair this time leading on six years from the events of part one, Paddy Considine takes centre stage as a crusading policeman brought in to take over the hunt for the Yorkshire Ripper. Corruption,intimidation and murder are the trademarks of the West Yorkshire police in another stunning film that fairly crackles with conspiracy and intrigue. Sean Harris is truly frightening as Bob Craven and again another superb cast is assembled for an authentic and poignant look at the "Ripper" killings. Peter Mullan and David Morrissey are again on the periphery of things and although Maxine Peak turns up as a female detective,for me she'll never shake off that performance she gave as Moors Murderer Myra Hindley. Looking forward to part III tomorrow.
-
Following on from Red Riding: In the Year of Our Lord 1974 we again see police corruption in Yorkshire, this time set around the real life hunt for the Yorkshire Ripper. Paddy Considine plays Assistant Chief Constable Peter Hunter, a Manchester officer who has been brought in to start the Ripper hunt with a fresh pair of eyes, much to the dismay of some of the characters we met in 1974. This was an exciting story, with an end I didn't expect!
-
Picking up the threads of 1974, part 2 of the red riding trilogy takes place 6 years later and dances its events around the search for the Yorkshire Ripper.
Make no mistake, while Peter Sutcliffe and his foulness are included as part of the episode, 1980 in reality has bog all to do with him except work on clues as to why the killing of a prostitute named Clare Strachan has been included as a ripper killing when he thinks it isn't, and also to investigate the inept and corrupt officers who are handling the case under the guise of assisting with the investigations.
Handling all of this is Assistant Chief Constable Peter Hunter (a magnificent as always Paddy Considine)…
-
Man, this is a dark series of films.
Hunter: «So, if someone broke into your house, killed the dog and raped the wife, who would you be calling? Not the West Yorkshire Police then?»
Rev. Laws: «No, they would already be in there, wouldn't they?»
Peter Hunter (Considine) is hired from outside to lead the investigation team trying to close in on the «Yorkshire Ripper». He puts together his own team of two, but quickly gets into more trouble than he bargained for.
There is something odd about this series that I can't quite put my finger on. It is very realistic and very gritty, but at the same time has a surreal ring to it. It is hard to…
-
You don't like the police much, do you?
-Peter HunterHow do you follow up the excellent Red Riding 1974? By casting Paddy Considine as the lead in the second part. That's how.
This is the film that deals directly (or indirectly) with the Yorkshire Ripper. It's link to the first film seems trivial, but is actually pivotal when you dwell on it for more then two seconds. It's one of those films that has a lot going on underneath the surface and I imagine only gets better with repeat viewing.
The film being extremely dense might turn off some viewers as it has a tendency to let you connect the dots on your own. In an age where Hollywood…
-
After the nonstop dark intensity of 1974, 1980 plays things a lot more reserved and close to the chest. Like it's predecessor, this one opens up by throwing us right in the middle of a serial murder case, led this time by Paddy Considine's Peter Hunter, and then slowly delves more into the world of corruption within the Yorkshire police force. Whereas the first film took us into this terrifying world through the eyes of a journalist, here we are right in the middle of the police, studying the corrupt within the force along with those outside of it.
Director James Marsh gives the film a sharp, stated tone that does a great job of putting us in the shoes…
Recent reviews
More-
The North is bleak, make no bones about it and the North in the 70's/80's was as grim a setting as it gets. Fallout from Thatcher and long, dark days in the moors provides the perfect backdrop for police corruption and a Yorkshire Ripper sub plot.
-
Following on from Red Riding: In the Year of Our Lord 1974 we again see police corruption in Yorkshire, this time set around the real life hunt for the Yorkshire Ripper. Paddy Considine plays Assistant Chief Constable Peter Hunter, a Manchester officer who has been brought in to start the Ripper hunt with a fresh pair of eyes, much to the dismay of some of the characters we met in 1974. This was an exciting story, with an end I didn't expect!
-
Picking up the threads of 1974, part 2 of the red riding trilogy takes place 6 years later and dances its events around the search for the Yorkshire Ripper.
Make no mistake, while Peter Sutcliffe and his foulness are included as part of the episode, 1980 in reality has bog all to do with him except work on clues as to why the killing of a prostitute named Clare Strachan has been included as a ripper killing when he thinks it isn't, and also to investigate the inept and corrupt officers who are handling the case under the guise of assisting with the investigations.
Handling all of this is Assistant Chief Constable Peter Hunter (a magnificent as always Paddy Considine)…
-
Man, this is a dark series of films.
Hunter: «So, if someone broke into your house, killed the dog and raped the wife, who would you be calling? Not the West Yorkshire Police then?»
Rev. Laws: «No, they would already be in there, wouldn't they?»
Peter Hunter (Considine) is hired from outside to lead the investigation team trying to close in on the «Yorkshire Ripper». He puts together his own team of two, but quickly gets into more trouble than he bargained for.
There is something odd about this series that I can't quite put my finger on. It is very realistic and very gritty, but at the same time has a surreal ring to it. It is hard to…
-
La mejor de la trilogía.
-
"The British Police are the best in the world
I don't believe one of these stories I've heard
'Bout them raiding our pubs for no reason at all
Lining the customers up by the wall
Picking out people and knocking them down
Resisting arrest as they're kicked on the ground
Searching their houses and calling them queer
I don't believe that sort of thing happens here"- "Glad To Be Gay", The Tom Robinson Band, 1978
Even though these films have been constructed as just that, films, they employ a strength normally associated with television. A number of the supporting characters from 1974 step further into the dim light thrown by the story- move from the deep shadows. Two coppers…
-
Far more intriguing, and better constructed, than Red Riding 1974. Paddy Considine is fantastic as detective Peter Hunter, a man who learns the hard way that some cases are best left unsolved.
-
My favourite of the lot, strangely enough. This is partially having to do with its connections to the real-life Yorkshire Ripper case, partially the fact that this is the one that really plays as a proper procedural (I love procedurals) and partially because of Paddy Considine's amazing performance.
The 35mm cinematography and rather straightforward editing may be less flashy than the work in the other two parts, but I don't mind. This seems the most cohesive whole, and has a good amount of emotion that results from great character work and not just gut reactions to ugliness onscreen.
Sean Harris' Bob Craven is terrifying. He should be in more films as the villain.
-
Definitely a much more personal story than 1974, though it's also a little bit more muddled and unfocused at times. Also, not that I'd hold it against the movie, but being the middle part of a trilogy, it doesn't stand very well on its own. The tone of the film is darker than its predecessor, too. The romanticism of the first film isn't really present here.
I think I'm starting to get the hang of the Yorkshire accent by now. I had to watch the first movie with subtitles.