Movies that are slightly off.
A thousand feet beneath the sea, the blackest holes are in the mind...
The OSSA discovers a spacecraft thought to be at least 300 years old at the bottom of the ocean. Immediately following the discovery, they decide to send a team down to the depths of the ocean to study the space craft.They are the best of best, smart and logical, and the perfect choice to learn more about the spacecraft.
I'd watch Sphere again, but if I did, I'd probably stop it three quarters the way in and fill the rest in for myself. The ending wrecks this film. Up to that point it's a brilliant, clever popcorn flick, with a heck of a lot of mystery and atmosphere. The cast is really bloody brilliant, and it's wonderfully engrossing.
But goddammit, the test audiences didn't like the original ending so they had to reshoot, and I assume, rewrite it, because it just felt so lacklustre. Dang the Hollywood system!
Not to mention there's a pretty BIG plot hole. The climax itself is just not as gripping and it loses all life it had. But damn, it was so good before.…
I remember voraciously reading Sphere when I was 15, and even today it is still to me the definitive popcorn airport thriller novel. It was an excellent read, and was my favourite Crichton novel at the time. It has a genius premise with a wonderful sense of mystery and a captivating psychological bent.
However, not all books translate well to film, and this is a good example. Some thrillers, especially a psychological thriller like this one, just work better on the page, particularly the more unbelievable ones like Sphere. Levinson does a solid genre job for the most part, but the film takes a nosedive very quickly after Jerry gets mad. Once the manifestations start to visually mount, and most…
First things first, this is not a good movie. However, I still really enjoy it. There are themes of psychology and humanity in here which I find very engaging. The sci in the sci-fi is laughable at times, as is the ending...yikes, but I don't really care as I like pretty much all of the characters (Hoffman and Jackson specifically are awesome and their interactions are so much fun to watch).
I do wish there was a bit deeper examination of some of the ideas raised by what happens to the crew, but while some people like dumb action movies, I'm more of a dumb sci-fi guy and can live with all of these flaws. So I guess this is like my Fast and Sphereous.
Bring to mind every 80s and 90s sci-fi film and there's a good chance Sphere is derivative of it in one way or another. The frustrating thing is that there are boatloads of great ideas in here. By here, I mean Crichton's novel, which I am going to to assume is an engrossing read. Right up my alley, I must say, and I plan on picking it up in the near future.
So what went wrong? My finger-wagging middle finger points squarely at Barry Levinson. How he edits the plot isn't exactly conductive to relating cool science or smart, likeable or skilled characters to the viewer. Everything is at service in enveloping you with mystery, narrowing logic that turns characters…
Sphere straddles a thin line of wanting to be a serious science fiction mystery and wanting to be a campy science fiction actioner, but is never very committed to either aspiration. Moreover, the film's ending does not hold up to analysis if you think about any of it for more than a few seconds.
I first became aware of “Sphere” whilst I was reading the Cracked article 6 Movies That Actually Deserve a Remake and was intrigued by the author’s appreciation for the film’s positive elements. So later when I had the opportunity to watch “Sphere”, I jumped at the chance and was pleasantly surprised.
A psychologist, mathematician, marine biologist, and astrophysicist are taken to an aircraft carrier under mysterious pretenses by the US military. The four soon find out that they have been recruited to explore a mysterious sunken spacecraft at the bottom of the ocean on the recommendation of the psychologist among them Dr. Norman Goodman (Dustin Hoffman) according to a report he wrote many years ago entitled “Recommendations for the…
It is a strong opening, and sets the scene while.
By the time the movie gets going, and say more less and third act maybe. It completely falls apart
The improvisational dialogue is probably the best thing this movie has going for it.
The story is imaginative, but the concept is executed sloppily. The casting is suspect (Sharon Stone?), the music is mildly okay, and the ending is overlapping levels of bananas.
Watching loony Samuel L. Jackson is fun, though.
For a movie that's literally about the power our imaginations possess, there's not too much going on that's, you know, imaginative.
Not so much *bad* as it is *underwhelming.* It wants to be ALIEN meets THE ABYSS but forgets to actually, y'know, have any compelling characters, which is what makes those movies work. Also, its so-called "logic" is basically one giant middle finger to the audience.
I merely watched an hour of this misfire, but I'm logging and counting it because I will never get that hour back.
If Samuel L. Jackson can suddenly decide he can manifest the power to forget the sphere, then I would like the same option when it comes to this movie.
Már az elején megmondtam: ennek a filmnek azért olyan rosszak az értékelései, mert a végén semmi sem derül ki. És tényleg! Miért nem tudunk meg arról a gömbről semmit? Honnan jött? Mi a célja?
Egyébként tök jó horror-sci-fi lehetne, mert a színészek jók, a zene és a rendezés is jó.
About half way through I gave up trying to watch it seriously and treated it as a comedy. It was so much better after that.
Terribly acted, terribly written and terribly directed but at some points so bad it's good.
A big collection of films that might be considered as strange, mindfucking, surreal and weird. Sorted by year. Suggestions are…
Every film title sequence featured on Art of the Title so far, from 1920's The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari to…