Spider-Man 3
Synopsis
The battle within.
The seemingly invincible Spider-Man goes up against an all-new crop of villains -- including the shape-shifting Sandman -- in the third installment of this blockbusting comic book adventure series . While Spidey's superpowers are altered by an alien organism, his alter ego, Peter Parker, deals with nemesis Eddie Brock and gets caught up in a love triangle.
Cast
Studios
Genres
Popular reviews
More-
This film reminds me of that fat, dead guy in Se7en.
You know the one who gets force fed so much food that his stomach bursts?
Yeah, this film is exactly like that.
-
Just in case I do end up watching The Amazing Spiderman, I wanted to see this again to remind myself just how bad it can be. Surprisingly, this isn't as bad as I remember it. It's still really bad.
I don't know what I can say that has'nt already been said about this film so I'm going to give 3 reasons why this is such a shit film instead of just ranting.
1. Villains- This is gonna be a long one. Literally, everything is wrong when it comes to the villains. James Franco isn't bad as New Goblin, it's just that New Goblin's storyline is handled very poorly (by the way, too many subplots is another big problem). You see…
-
I guess I'm the only person who likes this more than the second one. The comedy is actually funny here, and the action is almost as good. Plus, Peter and Mary Jane having actual real-life relationship problems that everyone has is a little more resonant to me than Peter keeping at arm's length because he's Spider-Man. There's some bullshit of course, and an over-reliance on CGI, but I think on the whole it's tonally smoother than 2. Kind of wish Raimi had gotten to do a 4th one now.
-
All 3 stars represent the real stars I saw when I passed out and hit my head on the coffee table, due to the lack of oxygen from laughing at Toby Maguires bad boy, saturday night fever strutting, emo fringe!
hahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahhhahahahhahhaahahahahaahaha
-
I'm not quite sure where to begin with Spider-Man 3. I'd heard for many years how poor this was but, I'll be honest, I didn't quite believe it... until now. The biggest question really is: how did Sam Raimi get this quite so utterly wrong? I'm no fan of the first movie, but the second was a clear improvement - building the character dynamics and the journey of Peter Parker while laying track for the future. That future, it turns out, is a calamitous mess of a motion picture - poorly written, plotted presumably by a three-year-old with Crayola, making the unforgivable assumption that more more MORE equals more, when in this case it equated to very much less. The…
-
A film full of ideas that are never truly realised. I grew up loving spiderman comics. This film does a disservice to that memory. If you reedit the movie with the sandman scenes only you have a heart wrenching four star movie. However with a badly underdeveloped venom story that wastes time and disgraces one of the best spiderman villains and those dancing scenes this film becomes an uncomfortable watch for most viewers. What a shame raimi ended his spiderman movies this way.
Recent reviews
More-
Sam Raimi, where did you go so wrong?
-
Not half as bad as I remember, but still only half as good as it should be.
On the side, the last 10 minutes of the movie are great, and so is each scene featuring Rosemary Harris's Aunt May. I tear up at each and every one still.
-
Nope.
-
symbiote exist !!!
-
Moments of fun and moments of epic failure.
-
All 3 stars represent the real stars I saw when I passed out and hit my head on the coffee table, due to the lack of oxygen from laughing at Toby Maguires bad boy, saturday night fever strutting, emo fringe!
hahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahhhahahahhahhaahahahahaahaha
-
Weakest movie of the trilogy. Thought it was a bit too long especially the part where Peter Parker becomes a playboy.
-
Far better than its horrid reputation would suggest. Better than the Amazing Spider-Man? Erm, yeah.
-
This isn't as bad as I remember, don't get me wrong, it's still a vile piece of shit but it has decent-ish moments, like that scene... actually, it doesn't. Actually, J.K Simmons is fun for the most part and despite some of his comedic moments being bizarrely placed he does prove to be okay. To be fair, he was made for the role of J.Jonah Jameson.
Despite this particular bright spark, the development of the characters is absolutely horrible, I know it's called Spiderman, but still, there ARE other characters that are not called Spiderman. Eddie Brock maybe? Sandman? Venom? Ha! Venom! What about that Goblin fella'? No? Alright, we'll just make Peter Parker dance around in a jazz club…