• misha winchester

    ★★★★ Added by misha winchester

    yehaw,,,

    View

  • Charles Palentine

    ★★★ Watched by Charles Palentine 14 Dec, 2012

    I suppose the obvious question here is, why? Not too long ago there was another acceptable version of Spiderman, and now a studio or particular producers have decided to add another entry. The answer of course is money. There’s simply no other reason this movie would otherwise need to be made as it follows the origins told in 2002 along with another, predictable (somewhat) happy ending. The only change made is the villain and the love interest. This, although it’s…

    View

  • Kelly Magovern

    ★★★ Watched by Kelly Magovern 21 Oct, 2014

    It was okay I guess. I'm always annoyed by that character in every superhero movie (in this case Denis Leary) who believes the superhero, who happens to be catching criminals, is actually a "menace" and he must be stopped! Ugh! Such an annoying cliché. Anyway, I like looking at Emma Stone a lot more than Kirsten Dunst. And I must say that Martin Sheen is looking more like Spencer Tracy all the time. XD

    View

  • Sebastian Von Fappywank

    ★½ Added by Sebastian Von Fappywank

    Amazingly Shit.

    View

  • Andy

    ★★★ Added by Andy

    Boh

    View

  • ninifish

    ★★★★ Added by ninifish

    蜘蛛人:驚奇再起

    我覺得還蠻好看的!
    是個比較像普通人的蜘蛛人XD
    女主角也蠻漂亮的^O^
    但我被反派角色嚇到好幾次 可惡>"<</p>

    View

  • mademoiselleem

    Watched by mademoiselleem 08 Jul, 2012

    watched at: theatre
    watched with: parents

    View

  • PointMan528491

    ★★★★½ Added by PointMan528491

    In 2002, Sam Raimi released his take on Spider-Man, the ever-popular comic book superhero. Upon release, it was praised in many aspects, and was a massive box office success. Two years later, a sequel was released to even more positive acclaim and the title of "one of the best superhero movies of all time." However, Raimi missed his mark with Spider-Man 3, which was a box office success, but received mixed reviews from critics. Spider-Man 4 fell into Development Hell,…

    View

  • James Carey

    ★★★ Added by James Carey

    Imagine being a spider on the wall at Colombia Pictures and overhearing the following conversation between various movie execs (the collective noun for which would be a bastard of movie execs):

    ME1: You know what I like more than money? More money.
    ME2: For sure. What was the last franchise that gave us more money?
    ME3: Spiderman
    ME1: Oh yeah - that paid for me to build my mansion entirely out of crack cocaine
    ME2: For sure. I bought an…

    View

  • Thomas Roche

    ½ Watched by Thomas Roche 10 Oct, 2014

    Oh mah DOG this thing iz unwatchible KARP. It is like some kind of half-asleep twelve-year-old's spec script except they went and made it in to a very bad movie. Nothing about this film is any good at all except Emma Stone is soooper cute and funny. She does what she can with some terrible lines, but there's far too little of her. Dennis Leary is also not bad, but he's not especially good. Not much saving that character, I'm…

    View

  • Andrew Hurley

    Watched by Andrew Hurley 11 Jul, 2012

    Marcus North Shore
    22:00
    Ultrascreen, Seat CC10

    View

  • jfavs

    Added by jfavs

    With the exception of the second Raimi movie, I find this to be the best spider-man movie yet. I find Andrew Garfield to be the superior Spider-man (pardon the pun) and Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy was a better love interest than Kirsten Dunst's MJ and they really stepped up on the action.

    View