• Jeffrey Flam

    ★★½ Added by Jeffrey Flam

    Not so amazing. Generic villain and basic plot with no surprises. Does nothing the Raimi films didn't do.

    View

  • Morgan Lewis

    ★★★½ Watched by Morgan Lewis 15 Jun, 2013

    Andrew Garfield is the weakest link in the acting; though his acting isn't actually bad (aside from his poor delivery on one-liners), he doesn't quite manage to come across as the high school loner that he's supposed to be depicting. Coupled with the odd-looking CGI for the Lizard, and the latter character's poorly-defined motivation, it hampers the film from being truly great. Nevertheless, it was a fun film and may lead to better films later on if improvements are made. Read full review.

    View

  • Jennifer Doe

    ★★ Watched by Jennifer Doe 17 Jun, 2013

    This would have been more aptly named "The Amazing Douchebag."

    View

  • James Rodrigues

    ★★★★ Rewatched by James Rodrigues 17 Jun, 2013

    Marc Webb delivers a new take on Spiderman, bringing a more likable cast that are more fit for their roles, with less goofy humor and better action. it's just a shame of the bad CG work that goes into The Lizard.

    View

  • joanacarvalho

    ★★★★ Added by joanacarvalho

    Admito que duas das quatro estrelas abaixo foram em razão da presença de Andrew Garfield nesse filme...

    View

  • Juan

    ★★★★★ Watched by Juan 29 May, 2013

    Saw it with a few of my friends, and just as awesome.

    View

  • Mr. DuLac

    ★★★★ Rewatched by Mr. DuLac 16 Jun, 2013 30

    I'll remind you what happened. Richard Parker said just about the same thing then that you are saying now. The clock is ticking, Dr. Connors.
    -Rajit Ratha

    My original review can be read here.

    This is the first time I've rewatched Amazing Spider-Man since seeing Life of Pi. I forgot that Irrfan Khan was in Amazing Spider-Man. I forgot that Peter Parker's father was named Richard. Every time Khan said "Richard Parker" I was looking for the tiger.

    View

  • Andi

    ★★★½ Watched by Andi 16 Jun, 2013

    Kellemes csalódás volt ez a film. Sokkal rosszabbra számítottam. Persze a Tobey Maguire-es trilógiát nem fogja túlszárnyalni, de már megközelítette.
    A film felével nem is volt semmi bajom. A gondok a második felével voltak. Egy-két hibát fel lehetett fedezni. Meg persze az erőltetett véletlenek... pl. pont ott esik le, ahol a daru van....
    Meg miért kell minden bombának, meg hasonló szerkezeteknek legalább 3 percet visszaszámlálniuk? Jah persze, hogy a jó közben megmentse a helyzetet...

    View

  • Christina

    ★★★ Rewatched by Christina 16 Jun, 2013

    I guess the degree to which you like this movie is proportional to how much you like Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker. I find him fine but not exciting so I give this movie good/3 stars rating. I had the rating higher but it kinda bored me re-watching it and I do not see myself busting it out again anytime in the near future.

    In the first trilogy, I liked Tobey Maguire but thought Kirsten Dunst was a bit meh…

    View

  • Stephanie

    ★★ Added by Stephanie

    This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.

    View

  • ehgilber

    ★★★★ Rewatched by ehgilber 19 May, 2013

    8.0

    View

  • Alin Wallace

    ★½ Rewatched by Alin Wallace 15 Jun, 2013

    This did NOT improve with a 2nd viewing.......

    But it does have the occasional moment. Occasionally.

    View