The Big Red One
1980 Directed by Samuel Fuller
Synopsis
A veteran sergeant of the World War I leads a squad in World War II, always in the company of the survivor Pvt. Griff, the writer Pvt. Zab, the Sicilian Pvt. Vinci and Pvt. Johnson in Vichy French Africa, Sicily, D-Day at Omaha Beach, Belgium and France, ending in a concentration camp in Czechoslovakia where they face the true horror of war.
Cast
Popular reviews
More-
I can only imagine the hell of war.
This outstanding war movie goes some way to making my imaginations real. There is no happy ending. Just men at war. For nearly 3 hours. It's brutal, it's draining, and its as real as I can imagine.
It's a fucking outstanding piece of work, made by a man who was there, and that doesn't happen often.
-
(Yhis is the Reconstructed version) No story. No characters. Just one combat episode after another, and it's one of the best war movies I've ever seen. It pretty much covers the same events as Band of Brothers (which at 10-12 hours is all around better, although it makes a lot of the same points). Lee Marvin is at his toned down best. Script by director Sam Fuller based on personal experience. Super duper movie!
-
The original release of "The Big Red One" was a highly compromised version of the film that never really felt like a film by Samuel Fuller. It's probably fair to say that a lot of Fuller's view of the world was shaped by his experiences in WWII, so seeing what the war really looked like from his perspective is a tantalizing prospect. The reconstructed version of "The Big Red One" finally feels like Fuller's vision of the war. It's an episodic tour of WWII from the perspective of an infantry squad led by veteran sergeant Lee Marvin and populated by a group of some of the most promising young actors of the early 80s ... Mark Hamill, Robert Carradine (in…
-
This was a rather long war film that felt very long; it didn't work for me. If I had read a synopsis of what little plot there was beforehand I think I would have imagined a thought-provoking film, but I would have been wrong because it wasn't.
-
I can only imagine the hell of war.
This outstanding war movie goes some way to making my imaginations real. There is no happy ending. Just men at war. For nearly 3 hours. It's brutal, it's draining, and its as real as I can imagine.
It's a fucking outstanding piece of work, made by a man who was there. That doesn't happen often.
Recent reviews
More-
(Yhis is the Reconstructed version) No story. No characters. Just one combat episode after another, and it's one of the best war movies I've ever seen. It pretty much covers the same events as Band of Brothers (which at 10-12 hours is all around better, although it makes a lot of the same points). Lee Marvin is at his toned down best. Script by director Sam Fuller based on personal experience. Super duper movie!
-
Such ambition on a budget. The more I think about it the more impressed I am with what I see. No mere prep for battle, battle, then process battle movie. Instead, the US 1st Infantry Division globe trots from North Africa all the way through World War ll to Czechoslovakia. As vast as this scope is, the camera never strays far from the faces of the sergeant and his unit, keeping this a close, personal experience. Maybe having money constraints is just the ticket, because it forces creativity and there is plenty of it here. There are some nice little touches when it comes to storytelling; a watch awash in red, showing the interminable length of time passing on Omaha…
-
I'm so happy they reconstructed this WWII classic. Samuel Fuller's semi-autobiographical film is brutally honest, it's not about heroes or heroics, it's about the realities of men trying to kill but not be killed and what that will do to you over a sustained period of time. Sure it's long and if you prefer set piece action and a specific plot (the saving of one lone private for nonsense reasons for example) then you might be disappointed. I however was not.
-
I expected a lot from this formerly lost World War Two film and it's fair to say I was let down. The film doesn't say much about the nature of war, we never find out much about the characters, and the battle scenes don't have the authenticity I'd have expected given the film was made by a real WW2 veteran. On the plus side, the battle scenes are fairly entertaining and there are several throughout the film. It's never boring, but it never really delivered in a major way either.
-
An excellent WWII film with Lee Marvin running a band of misfits.
-
The original release of "The Big Red One" was a highly compromised version of the film that never really felt like a film by Samuel Fuller. It's probably fair to say that a lot of Fuller's view of the world was shaped by his experiences in WWII, so seeing what the war really looked like from his perspective is a tantalizing prospect. The reconstructed version of "The Big Red One" finally feels like Fuller's vision of the war. It's an episodic tour of WWII from the perspective of an infantry squad led by veteran sergeant Lee Marvin and populated by a group of some of the most promising young actors of the early 80s ... Mark Hamill, Robert Carradine (in…
-
An absurdist take on war that only someone who had been to war could create. The version I saw wasn't the 2004 reconstruction, so I know there was a lot of footage I haven't seen. Perhaps that would make the film better, but I like how disjointed it is. The movie is truly bizarre and twisted, and once you get into the groove, its episodic nature really begins to work.
When I saw the scene where the Americans and French are killing each other, but then a cease-fire is called and the French surrender (as they always do; rimshot), and all the soldiers embrace. It's a ridiculous scene when you consider that one side just killed the friends and brothers…
-
Roger Ebert said in his review of this movie that THE BIG RED ONE is "one of the most expensive B-pictures ever made...'A' war movies are about War, but 'B' war movies are about soldiers." Therein lies the problem with so many A-level war films. Fuller's biggest foray war movies never gets too big for its britches the way so many war movies often do. Fuller is a spinner of pulp yarns first and foremost, and he keeps that spirit in tact here, even though he was also making his most personal film. Robert Carradine acts as Fuller's cypher, chomping a cigar the way Fuller was known to do, and the experiences of his squadron reflect Fuller's own when he…
-
I can only imagine the hell of war.
This outstanding war movie goes some way to making my imaginations real. There is no happy ending. Just men at war. For nearly 3 hours. It's brutal, it's draining, and its as real as I can imagine.
It's a fucking outstanding piece of work, made by a man who was there, and that doesn't happen often.