The Bride of Frankenstein
1935 Directed by James Whale
Synopsis
The monster demands a mate.
Bride of Frankenstein begins where James Whale's Frankenstein from 1931 ended. Dr. Frankenstein has not been killed as previously portrayed and now he wants to get away from the mad experiments. Yet when his wife is kidnapped by his creation, Frankenstein agrees to help him create a new monster, this time a woman.
Cast
Studio
Genres
Popular reviews
More-
I enjoyed this so much that it makes me feel silly for never seeing any of the classic Universal Monsters films before now.
It's got wonderfully atmospheric sets and B&W cinematography, entertaining and innovative special effects, and a cast full of excellent performances (especially Ernest Thesinger as the amusingly macabre Doctor Pretorius and of course Boris Karloff as the monster). The comic relief (especially Una O'Connor as a high-strung chambermaid) is occasionally grating, but it's so overwhelmed by the awesomeness that I wouldn't even think of knocking it down half a star.
So beautiful, and it was interesting to finally see it after years of seeing references to it in everything from WEIRD SCIENCE to Tim Burton's entire oeuvre.
Now, onto DRACULA, THE WOLF MAN, THE MUMMY, THE INVISIBLE MAN, THE CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON, and the original FRANKENSTEIN.
"To a new world, of gods and monsters!"
-
As I started my Universal monster movie marathon with Frankenstein it is only fitting that I finish it with James Whale’s sequel, The Bride of Frankenstein. Many consider this to be a rare example of a sequel that is better than the film that preceded it but I’m not quite sure I agree. It is still an undoubtedly brilliant movie that is self-referential, clever and beautifully filmed but I do prefer the simplicity of the original Frankenstein, not least because it is the purer horror film.
Although the story kicks-off almost exactly where Frankenstein finished (watching the iconic windmill burn to the ground) it rather fittingly takes on a life of its own. Instead of a Gothic horror story it…
-
Part of **Halloween Season 2012**.
Doctor Pratorius (Ernest Thesiger) is more delicious on the big screen than he is on the small screen -- and that's saying something. So is Dwight Frye, whatever character he plays in any film.
Watching this and the original in succession really accentuates how much more sly humor James Whale has added. Una O'Connor's over the top Minnie notwithstanding, there's just a greater perverse joy in the goings-on, compared to the gorgeous but played-completely-straight original.
And really, what's with all the crucifixes? You'd think there's some kind of message about wrongful execution, especially since the Monster himself gets crucified. *wink*
-
Part of...
Horroctober 2012Sometimes I have wondered whether life wouldn't be much more amusing if we were all devils, no nonsense about angels and being good.
-Dr. PretoriusI already wrote a flimsy review for this movie earlier this year so I'll just point out a few things I might have missed.
Boris Karloff's performance as the monster is criminally underappreciated in this day and age. In a film filled with memorable performances, it's Karloff's that is the heart and soul of the story. While Frankenstein's monster has been portrayed as a simpleton in various forms since, here he's a sympathetic and tragic character that is continually being used and misunderstood.
Ernest Thesiger's Dr. Pretorius is one of the…
-
Part of **Halloween Season 2012**.
First things first: Sloth from The Goonies owes a great deal to Karloff's Monster. His childlike glee and innocent need for love mixed with an unpredictable capacity for violence come right out of Bride of Frankenstein. Go ahead. Watch them both, and tell me that actor didn't study Karloff. I'll wait. . .
You back? Then you know what I mean.
Now where was I? Ah, yes, I didn't think this film could surpass the original. On first viewing, I was prepared to give it a lower rating. I couldn't stand Una O'Connor's Minnie -- or any of the comic relief, for that matter, which seemed to distract more than it helped. I missed Mae…
-
The visual definition of the term classic.
Recent reviews
More-
I really enjoyed the first Frankenstein film and many say that this one is better. I didn’t quite think it was but it is certainly on par. I was surprised how little the bride is actually in the film. She appears for about five minutes near the end and that’s it. Frankenstein’s monster is a lot more vocal in this one and there’s a great scene where he becomes friends with an old blind man. Karloff does a great job brining emotion to the role. I really loved the sets in this too. It’s a really nice film but I think I would have liked to have seen more of the bride and her interacting with the monster.
-
I am somewhat surprised that this particular film is not mentioned in more top film lists for horror, Classic Hollywood or even the AFI best films. It is quite realized and draws upon both the German Expressionist and Melodramatic traditions so key to the era. Sure it ends a bit quickly, but that does not make its possibilities for filmic criticism and theory any less and it manages to remain a pertinent cautionary tale on multiple levels.
-
What can be more horrifying then the Frankenstein monster sitting around smoking himself high, learning that wood is good and getting horny?!
-
Quite simply the greatest horror film ever made.
-
She's Aliveeeee!!!!!
-
James Whale really was a gifted artist. This is the third film I've seen from him (the others being 1936's Show Boat, a flawed film that is not without its merits, and 1931's Frankenstein, as well as the 1998 biopic about him, Gods and Monsters), and I'm pretty sure it's the best. Every once in a while, there is a sequel that the common consensus is that it is just as good, if not better, than its predecessor (The Godfather, Part II and Toy Story 2 being common examples). Bride of Frankenstein may be the first film where I actually believe that (don't get me wrong--Godfather II and Toy Story 2 are both great films, but they are only great…
-
With all that electricity flying around at the end, you'd think that God In His Infinite Mercy would've sent at least one stray lightning bolt down to smite the jibbering, squawking, unbelievably annoying "comedy relief", Una O'Connor, and put us all out of our misery. Putting that aside, a practically flawless, if somewhat plummily-acted, masterpiece of early horror cinema.
-
A rollicking good time. Way ahead of its time and full of iconic scenes. Short, well paced and worth a watch...even if you aren't into horror films (which I am not). Loved it.
-
I enjoyed this so much that it makes me feel silly for never seeing any of the classic Universal Monsters films before now.
It's got wonderfully atmospheric sets and B&W cinematography, entertaining and innovative special effects, and a cast full of excellent performances (especially Ernest Thesinger as the amusingly macabre Doctor Pretorius and of course Boris Karloff as the monster). The comic relief (especially Una O'Connor as a high-strung chambermaid) is occasionally grating, but it's so overwhelmed by the awesomeness that I wouldn't even think of knocking it down half a star.
So beautiful, and it was interesting to finally see it after years of seeing references to it in everything from WEIRD SCIENCE to Tim Burton's entire oeuvre.
Now, onto DRACULA, THE WOLF MAN, THE MUMMY, THE INVISIBLE MAN, THE CREATURE FROM THE BLACK LAGOON, and the original FRANKENSTEIN.
"To a new world, of gods and monsters!"