All the films from all the editions, including those subsequently removed, presently totalling 1167. An easy way of seeing how…
The Constant Gardener
Love. At any cost.
Justin Quayle is a low-level British diplomat who has always gone about his work very quietly, not causing any problems. But after his radical wife Tessa is killed he becomes determined to find out why, thrusting himself into the middle of a very dangerous conspiracy.
Rachel Weisz makes an even better couple with Voldemort than she did with Wolverine in ‘The Fountain’ and that’s saying something! No seriously, I love Weisz and she is again amazing in this, as is her partner. Both ensure their character with life and complexity to an extent that you rarely see in films of an all in all moderate length. ‘The Constant Gardener’ is as much of a study of these personas as it is a mystery slash thriller, but the story surely doesn’t suffer from the time and effort that is put into the development of these people. On the contrary, the plot is multifaceted, exciting and surprising. Most importantly, whereas many other similar sort of movies get trapped in plot holes, I was unable to identify one mistake or ambiguity in ‘The Constant Gardener’, it seems perfectly coherent and realistic too.
The Constant Gardener Review
"Do you no good to go poking around under rocks, Justin. Some very nasty things live under rocks, especially in foreign gardens." - Sir Bernard Pellegrin
The Constant Gardener takes it's name from the book it adapts and the fact that the main character is in the sense a "constant" gardener even though we only see him water plants and buy seeds. This film tries to mask itself as an intense revenger's tragedy with a spy thriller all throughout Kenya as a conspiracy about the lethal testing of drugs is tested on Africans. In reality if you focus on it, it's really just a melodramatic love story about a man who's trying to finish what his…
This is a forgotten gem of a film.
The color, style, camera movement and editing in this film is so full of energy and purpose.
Jumping around in time, we are shown the death of character before the buildup of her relationship. When the timeline circles back to the death again it doesn't come across like a replay - amazingly there is emotional weight to the outcome that is already known. Moving still ahead in time, voiceover of Tessa continue to build her character while haunting whatever is on screen with the burden of Justin's loss.
The use of saturated colors against scenes with grey tones is amazing at conveying location - but also emotional states. Justin returns to a…
The Constant Gardener is a master work of suspense brought on by ways of love and deceit.
A political thriller that kept me guessing where it was headed through all the lies and just how cool headed Justin Quayle (Ralph Fiennes) would react to the truths of his wife Tessa (Rachel Weisz) and her life and work even when his suspicions were on the highest of levels.
Politics are the evil that rules the world and it is showcased in this brilliant film.
This is a forgotten gem. It's a great film in every aspect, from the excellent camerawork, to a terrific performance from Ralph Fiennes, to an exciting and intriguing plot. The Constant Gardener is an overlooked, excellent thriller.
Words cannot describe just how utterly PISSED off I am that I didn't see Ralph Fiennes mowing a lawn for 2 hours!!
DAMN YOU, trade descriptions act!!
Fernando Meirelles's style of filmmaking has gotten very tired in very little time. I mean, it has been ten years, but we still have shaky, faux-documentary style thrillers, but in comparison to more precise directors like Michael Mann and Paul Greengrass, Meirelles seems like an amatuer. The reason? There is a lot of cutting, a lot of shaking, a lot of coverage, a lot of angles, but the saturation of images doesn't seem to be saying much at all.
This is not to say that there aren't good things about 'The Constant Gardener'. It's cinematography is messy and incongruent, but the editing (by Claire Simpson), creates some interesting rhythms. Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz are at the top of their…
Chap on a mission.
A movie that confuses the viewer on purpose in order to spin a tale of corruption, deceit and love. Beautiful cinematography and acting. The movie is a tragedy when a woman tries to expose big business and the corruption it creates in Africa.
Didn't feel the tension or the despair as much as the film wanted me to. I feel like it's another film whose goals I admire, yet whose execution I am wary of.
Beautiful photography. Beautiful story... Beautiful movie
A war of indifference, a marriage of convenience.
Truly seething, like a lot of John le Carre's post-Cold War work. Fernando Mierelles directs it beautifully (where the Hell is he now? "Blindness" wasn't THAT bad, was it?). Fiennes and Weisz are magnificent.
With the use of frenetic, handheld, Greengrassian photography transplanted from his previous feature "The City of God" Fernando Meirelles managed to turn an otherwise straightforward murder mystery/conspiracy story into something quite enjoyable. As a result, "The constant gardener" is a very dense, claustrophobic picture that somehow veers away from the usual story-driven path to focus on the characters, which is what makes this film really something else.
The combination of performances by Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz with a very intimate, almost a hidden-camera-like, documentary-esque cinematography and editing really elevated this film for me. At the end of the day I could really take or leave the intricacies of the plot, which may or may not have been too complex…
Nada como rever um "excelente" filme. Contextos como a violência e a miséria na Africa dão sempre bons filmes. Bom trama, bom final. Nota 10
A widower is determined to get to the bottom of a potentially explosive secret involving his wife's murder, big business, and corporate corruption. - IMDB
Before watching this, I had no idea what it was about at all. I just assumed that it was your run of the mill romance type film. It's not that, but it does have it's dull moments. Still decent though.
The rating I've given it seems low, but I couldn't see myself giving it anything higher. I usually reserve a higher rating for something that I enjoy and wish to see again. This, I won't be in any hurry to see any time soon, or again.
Despite all that I did enjoy it for the most part. It was shot well and the actors brought their A-Game. I'd suggest that you make this a 'one and done'.
Every film that has ever been nominated for an Academy Award in any category. Enjoy!
Every film Roger Ebert has given a four-star rating. This is an ongoing project.