My most watched movie of all time is Heathers but that is surprisingly not the film that made me fall…
Two best friends. Nothing could come between them... or could it?
Longtime friends Ronny and Nick are partners in an auto-design firm. They are hard at work on a presentation for a dream project that would really launch their company. Then Ronny spots Nick's wife out with another man, and in the process of investigating the possible affair, he learns that Nick has a few secrets of his own. As the presentation nears, Ronny agonizes over what might happen if the truth gets out.
The only dilemma I experienced was finding the motivation to finish this turd.
No dilemma whatsoever.
Occasionally, I embrace the idea of watching a film that I assume will be bad, just to see for myself on the outside chance that I end up getting some semblance of enjoyment out of it. This happened last night/this morning when I, or I should say my wife, stumbled upon The Dilemma on television. "Nothing else is on" she says, to justify the decision after I gave her the look of disapproval, so I decided to jump on board as well.
You see, this was the eve of our only child going off to her first day of Kindergarten, and that blend of nerves and genuine time moves too fast sadness made a mindless comedy seem like the right…
To borrow a line from my one of my favorite SNL sketches, I'm not sure this legally qualifies as a comedy.
But I'm not sure it wants to be. It's more a drama starring comedy actors than an actual comedy. There are a few deliberately humorous scenes involving Channing Tatum as this scuzzy home-wrecker, but mostly this is a much darker movie than I expected, with Vince Vaughn essentially stalking and intimidating his best friend's wife after he discovers she's been unfaithful.
This kind of reminded me, in an inferior way, of THE BREAK-UP, another Vaughn movie with comic trappings and a surprisingly bleak perspective. I think that movie's much more successful -- more confident in exactly what it wants to be -- but I have to admit I found this movie a lot more interesting than I expected, even if only in a what-the-hell-were-they-thinking sort of way.
Whaaaaaaaaaat? Ron Howard directed this tripe? I'm not a fan of all his films but this? This is sub par film making that'll blot his C.V. for some time to come.
I don't even know what the point of the film was, its plot is all over the place never establishing what it wants to be. Is it about being a good friend? Not being a liar? Being supportive? It's a rom-com without the rom and a lads movie without the raunchiness.
I remember when Vince Vaughn was in Swingers, you'd never think it now.
Really Ron Howard, shame on you.
Sometimes its nice to see comedians take on serious roles. I dont get why this got such a bad rap. I always want to watch it again.
The 1 star is for Winona alone
A dry comedy (or may be it was meant to be serious). It is difficult to tell. The premise has a lot of possibilities which were completely squandered by taking them the wrong way (which could have been funny if played as a farce).
Winona Ryder does well; but her part is too small to rescue the rest of the film.
This one is excruciatingly bad. What on earth was Ron Howard thinking? It doest work on any level. Not as a comedy, or thriller, or drama.
Two friends have found themselves in a dilemma... Punky's dilemma: "Wish I was a Kellogg's Corn Flake, floating in my bowl, takin' movies." Yeah, the friends in question aren't Simon & Garfunkel, although this film is about as surrealistic as "Punky's Dilemma", based solely on the fact that it's Ron Howard following all of his deep, heavy dramatic epics with a silly comedy... something that he, you know, has never made in his entire career as a filmmaker. Seriously though, Howard's preceding comedy (2000's "The Grinch") was far enough back for this to pretty much be his "A Good Year", except instead of getting his and Ridley Scott's mutual buddy Russell Crowe, he got the awesomely talented and respectable thespians Vince…
Ugly men with unrealistic wives.
I accidently watched this film because it was on TV and couldn't decide what to do. Well, I didn't like it that much and won't recommend it.
Esforzado e interesante intento de Ron Howard por asomarse a un cine comercial “de personajes” –es manido pero obligado situar a James L. Brooks como referente- cuyos resultados están lejos de la loable propuesta.
Parte importante de la culpa la tiene la elección de la pareja masculina protagonista. Con Vaughn implicado en la producción, era de temer un vehículo para su lucimiento. Y lo hay. El vehículo, no el lucimiento. Algún día las facultades estudiarán el éxito de este intérprete tan llamativamente poco dotado. A su lado, el también anodino Kevin James poco puede hacer. Apunte importante: el cine “de personajes” no es nada si no se apoya en buenos actores.
Tan formulista y previsible como inofensiva.
Germans really like to spice up English movie titles. And with spicing up, I mean ruining them.
See the notes…
Howard is, in my opinion, one of the finest directors working today. Workmanlike, energetic, and very strong in effective bio-pics,…