• AndresMtl

    ★★★ Watched by AndresMtl 29 Sep, 2014

    A below average romantic comedy with a long running time. BUT Jason Segel and Emily Blunt are adorable, aren't they?


  • Gabrielle

    ★★★ Watched by Gabrielle 29 Sep, 2014

    Meh. It's okay. If it weren't for Jason Segel and Chris Pratt there would literally be nothing there, though.


  • Carlos Rodríguez

    ★★★ Watched by Carlos Rodríguez 14 Aug, 2014

    The Five-Year Engagement goes from being very funny to be mildly amusing, and then to not being funny at all at an irregular pace. The plot is nothing too original but sometimes it seemed to work fine, partly because the writing really tried to avoid clichés. More consistent jokes would have made it better, but what it needed the most was a more condensed storyline. A length of over two hours for a film like this is simply excessive. Luckily…


  • JaySalahi

    ★★½ Watched by JaySalahi 21 May, 2013

    C+ (78)


  • Windyblue

    ★★ Added by Windyblue

    Limp, unfunny, undrama. Just some stuff happens. There's no reason for this to attract viewers.


  • Richard F

    ★★★½ Watched by Richard F 09 May, 2013

    Much like the engagement period the title refers to, this movie was way too damn long. Over two hours long, and it drags in parts. Other than that, though, it was fine. Relatively funny, Emily Blunt is cute, Chris Pratt was pretty great and there were a lot of cool cameos. It was a pretty enjoyable film that gets dragged down in the middle. Could have used some more editing.


  • John Connor

    ★★★ Watched by John Connor 04 May, 2012

    This amiable, rambling, semi-sorta-plotless comedy coasted by on the easy charm of its leads, never really extending itself enough to be either particularly good or particularly bad. A film this slight should have been much shorter, though, and it's not like there's no fat in there that could have been trimmed. (Big props go to Brie for nailing Blunt's accent in order to play her sister. It's perfect.)


  • Nick Britt

    ★★ Watched by Nick Britt 05 Sep, 2014

    Just a bad film. The leads aren't funny, which was a disappointment since I like Segal and Blunt. The supporting cast is the only thing that makes this film bearable. Way too long. Do not recommend.


  • Ms_Coen

    ★★½ Watched by Ms_Coen 04 Sep, 2014

    "C is for condom. That's good enough for me." I love Emily Blunt.


  • Brett the Wiese

    ★★★★ Watched by Brett the Wiese 31 Aug, 2014

    That was a bit overlong, but it had a lot of really clever and hilarious moments that really endeared me. Plus, the taco truck segment was better than all of Chef. Rhys Ifans needs to do more comedy. And I want a Choose-Your-Own-Wedding.


  • Michael Clarke

    ★★ Watched by Michael Clarke 28 Aug, 2014

    You'd think a film with such an impressive cast of comedic performers would be funny. But it isn't. It's also fucking loooong. What a shame. Plus points for Emily Blunt and Alison Brie, and the Elmo scene.


  • radiomanhead

    ★★★½ Added by radiomanhead

    Pues es una comedia de enredos de pareja con Jason Segel así que ya sabemos que nos vamos a encontrar: buenos diálogos, personajes secundarios memorables, gran química con la chica de turno (increíble Emily Blunt en su faceta cómica) y la forma tan graciosa de tomar cosas tan propias de la vida en pareja y de la vida en general, la película dura media hora mas de la cuenta y llega a perder el ritmo varias veces por eso, sino, estaríamos hablando de una comedia romántica notable.