This list is complied from the films mentioned in Jack Lehtonen's Mubi list on vulgar auteurism, the films mentioned in…
The Taking of Pelham 123
I can't get it out of my head. I'm gonna die today.
Armed men hijack a New York City subway train, holding the passengers hostage in return for a ransom, and turning an ordinary day's work for dispatcher Walter Garber into a face-off with the mastermind behind the crime.
Tony Scott did action films with a real popcorn flavor. This remake of Joesph Sargent's superior 1974 film may have had two headline actors in the shape of Denzel Washington and John Travolta, but it didn't have the gritty tension and flair that Robert Shaw and Walter Matthau delivered in spades.
The plot is simple, a group of gunmen hijack a New York subway train and ask for a ransom. Obviously there's more to the story than that, but it's played out as just that, a hijacking. Political issues and a scandalous backdrop for MTA dispatcher Washington add to the intrigue but it's the shouty hijacker played by Travolta who really takes center stage. He's motivated, full of anger and…
The plot is taking the piss by numbers, Denzel really stretches himself and Travolta plays a much camper version of that guy in Swordfish (so, some would say, less of a stretch for him). Even Turturro seems transplanted in from Transformers. The only character that departs from cliché is Gandolfini's NY Mayor, who shows signs of actual wit and a bit of inteligence (a tribute to Rudy Giuliani no doubt, who's given the position a lick of respect). Instantly forgettable, the trademark T.Scott hyperactive, hyperstylised editing soon gets tiresome. Watch Unstoppable instead or pay to see 'Money Train' again (which is so bad and cheesy it's bordering on good) and help Wesley Snipes pay off some of his tax bill.
I give this film a fully voiced, resounding and heart felt: 'Meh'
I know all of you will probably disagree with me on this one but i loved this movie, i just love denzel Washington and once again he's delivered a fantastic performance and so does john travolta, I mean seriously denzel Washington is fucking awesome listen to the list of movies he's starred in training day, taking of pelham 123, american gangster, flight, crimson tide, man on fire, the equalizer, glory, de ja vu, ricochet, the great debaters, Malcolm x and the inside man this guy is a legend.
Short Review: I remember when this came out, it seems like I saw nothing but bad reviews, with oodles of people claiming it doesn't beat the 1970s classic.
Now that I've seen the "classic" one, I have to say...so? As good as the original is, I think this remake is still a blast. The pacing is much higher, the style is really slick and cool (if not a tad overbearing), I think Travolta and Washington are way more colorful characters, and the whole plot is still engaging. I can understand people taking issue with the editing and language, but I think this film is quite underrated.
I miss Tony Scott.
Naw. Scott's frantic mix of slo-mo and style can't lift unexciting visuals and a color by numbers 123 plot.
Hajsza a Föld Alatt
Despite all the talk about NYC, this is really a movie about two guys getting to know each other and searching for mutual respect.
I really enjoy this film. The end falls apart a little bit but its definitely one of Tony Scott's best films.
After seeing Man On Fire, I've taken quite a liking to a Denzel/Scott combo, so what better way to add fuel to the fire by indulging in The Taking Of Pelham 123. It's been soooo long since I've watched Crimson Tide and at the time it was Gene Hackman who I really focused my admiration on and Denzel, as young as he was at the time, was barely background scenery I my view.
Great to see James Gandolfini aswell .....another fallen legend.
Taking Of Pelham 123 is about a New York City subway dispatcher, Garber, played by Denzel Washington who's day spirals out of control as one of his trains is hijacked by Ryder, played by John Travolta. Ryder is…
I miss Tony Scott.
A nice idea, executed well. A lot of reviews were negative because of the comparison to the original 70's version of the film. Not having seen it, it's not affected my view, although a lot of that criticism appears to be around the fact that it's "different". Whatever those differences are, I don't believe a modern version is necessarily affected by changes that make it more relevant to a contemporary audience.
One change I do know they made was to make the "hero" character in this one slightly less so, which was a neat twist. You understand his reasons for what he did and still root for him, even though he's not the 100% hero, making him more the "everyman" character that sadly lacks from many films.
Rapaz... o filme é legal, muita conversa e pouca história, mais vale a pena ver num domingo de noite.. .
The Guardian's list of 1000 books to read before you die is both inspiring and infuriating. Here is their same…
what movie pisses you off? What movie makes u mad ?
What movie do you totally hate?!?