The Twilight Saga: New Moon The Twilight Saga: New Moon
2009 Directed by Chris Weitz
Synopsis
The Next Chapter Begins.
Forks, Washington resident Bella Swan is reeling from the departure of her vampire love, Edward Cullen, and finds comfort in her friendship with Jacob Black, a werewolf. But before she knows it, she's thrust into a centuries-old conflict, and her desire to be with Edward at any cost leads her to take greater and greater risks.
Cast
Studio
Popular reviews
More-
Romeo & Juliet 2.0, but neither of them die and Juliet is a slut
-
Just a quick reminder that I do not make all the movie-watching decisions in my life.
-
I kind of have to applaud New Moon and its director for polishing up in terms of how the film looks. Chris Weitz seems determined to turn the whole film into the proper melodrama these things should be rather than Catherine Hardwicke's dull predecessor.
And I must say, during the opening of the film, I was actually convinced that New Moon might turn out to be a rather competent film. There's some good setup here and an attempt to add intrigue to this story. There's the looming threat of Victoria from the previous film, The Volturi (more on that later), and there's also an attempt to add some depth and overall growth to Bella's character,…
-
New Moon is easily better than the dour first film, and as a fan of Dawson's Creek I can sort of understand the appeal of this brand of teenage cheesiness, but man did this become torture by the end.
-
Well, slap my Fanning,
There's beefcake in them thar woods!
Team Jacob, bitches. -
The only good thing I can possibly say about this tripe is that is the most memorable Twilight film because it so bloody bad (seriously I can't remember Eclipse because it was so average!)...
Recent reviews
More-
Godawful.
-
If the first film was a vampire film with incredibly annoying characters where little happens, then this isn't even a vampire film, with a new annoying character where absolutely nothing happens.
-
Nefasta.
-
There's a copy of Romeo & Juliet displayed prominently at the beginning of this. Yeah, we get it, Twilight! It's like Romeo and Juliet! This movie isn't smart by any means, but they don't trust their idiot fans to get even the slightest subtlety, so we get a big glimpse of this Romeo and Juliet book and, later, when Bella looks out a window the scenery changes from fall to winter in a montage, yet we still get the title cards that say "October," "November," "December." Did the director think the audience would be baffled that the weather changed from fall to blizzards in the blink of an eye? Why spell out, literally, that time has elapsed when we can clearly…
-
The acting is so bad but the soundtrack is so good.
-
Now I know what you're thinking! "Five stars? Is he mental?" Well maybe I am. To me, there is a problem with rating this movie. It is bad. But to me, it's so bad that it's good. I was dragged to the theater in 2009 and had hands down the most fun all year. So based on my enjoyment I absolutely loved this movie. Naturally everyone else in the theater hated me. But how do you rate such a film? Do you watch "Plan 9 from Outer Space" (1959) and go "Booo! Zero stars!" or do you go "Five stars! That was amazing!"?
It seems they threw all seriousness out of the window and made every single scene completely over…
-
Less romantic and heartbreaking saddest of the four storys and five movies not to mention the fact that Bella riding with the biker was pathetic, the Twilight Saga focus on a love triangles, fight and protection for the love of a human girl who's surrounded by werewolves and vampires don't see that everyday.
-
This may be the worst installment of the Twilight saga, coming right on the heels of the best. There are two reasons for that. First, we're seeing more of the supernatural in this film, adding in werewolves and a vampire council. By bringing these elements out to the forefront, it only shines a spotlight on how ill-conceived said elements are, as I mentioned when I wrote about Twilight. The second, and more important reason why this is the worst Twilight movie is because Kristen Stewart gives a performance that makes me want to blind and deafen myself. With a spork.
Look, Stewart's not totally to blame. Her character is HORRIBLY written here and I find it completely unbelievable that any…
-
Totally corny, but somehow it works. Getting Lautner shirtless becomes tiresome and he's a horrible actor, maybe they all are, but it gets so cheesy it's good I guess???
I think adding the other Vampires of Sheen, Fanning and that family really helps. They are a blast, but very limited.
Lefevre is totally wasted, basically just running around in her brief time.The big plus is giving Greene a bigger role this time. She is great and once her part kicks in, the film is golden in the last act.