Torn Curtain
1966 Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
Synopsis
It tears you apart with suspense!
An American scientist publicly defects to East Germany as part of a cloak and dagger mission to find the solution for a formula resin and then figuring out a plan to escape back to the West.
Cast
Studio
Popular reviews
More-
Part of the Alfred Hitchcock Sound Era Films In Chronological Order project.
For two films in a row Alfred Hitchcock seemingly had a great film within his grasp only for poor pacing and a lack of focus on the more interesting elements of the plot to let it down.
Rather bizarrely pitched by some critics at the time as Hitchcock's attempt to do an 'intelligent James Bond' film, his spy thriller is absolutely nothing like any of the Bond films at all. In fact, Paul Newman is barely a spy at all - let's just say he's extremely unlikely to escape the grasp of the Stasi with a jetpack, with Julie Andrews gripped under one arm.
The problem Hitchcock laces…
-
Thoroughly enjoyable but only intermittently gripping - Andrews is a little too sweet, Newman a touch too cold. Cut the romanticals and you've got a lean collection of set pieces to rival The 39 Steps.
-
How does it feel to play the part of a dirty defector?
-FarmerAlfred Hitchcock's first film for Universal Pictures proved a bit stressful as he wasn't given full control over his picture and was "suggested" who he should put in the leads. Having to prove himself at that stage in his career was a bit ridiculous, but he did and gained his accustomed control over his films again. From 1958 to 1963, Hitchcock gave us four masterpieces in succession. It was the next film however that would bring everything back to zero in the eyes of Universal Studios.
Marnie came out in 1964 to mild critical and box office disappointment. The film was also the second time Hitch cast…
-
The film has the look and feel of a James Bond film from the same period, it shares many of the same elements like spying behind the Iron Curtain, the cold war, ruthless and cynical East Germans, and so on. But it's never exciting.
Linguists will have a hard time watching this. Myself not being one, but being Scandinavian, I just had to laugh at the puny attempts of speaking Norwegian, Swedish and Danish. The film for some reason starts out on a ship in a Norwegian fjord. Why I don't know. I had to rewind to try and pick up what the Norwegian crew were saying. They spoke excellent English, however, and quickly made the wise choice of switching…
-
I actually attempted to watch Torn Curtain when I was very young, probably around the age of ten, but shut it off out of boredom. Well, time and age both bring clarity, as I managed to really like this movie. I never found myself bored, but actually became rather intrigued by the plot. I thought the lead performances were particularly good (it’s always a pleasure to watch Paul Newman), and many of the suspense sequences towards the end of the film represent great Hitchcock moments. I think the sequence at the farm though is the one that almost everyone, even the film’s detractors, will remember. Simply great film making.
-
Decent spy thriller from Hitchcock. As most of the reviews on here state, the farmhouse scene is probably the best part of the movie.
Recent reviews
More-
Thoroughly enjoyable but only intermittently gripping - Andrews is a little too sweet, Newman a touch too cold. Cut the romanticals and you've got a lean collection of set pieces to rival The 39 Steps.
-
I've had quite a lengthy break away from my Hitchcock box set, partly due to other commitments and partly due to how uninspired I was after Marnie (1964). Thankfully Torn Curtain is at least a little better - but not by much. I did like Paul Newman but found Julie Andrews to be somewhat annoying. I can't pin down if this is due to the character or the performance, but regardless the outcome is the same. As for story, Torn Curtain is certainly more interesting than Marnie, but considering Hitchcock is regarded as the master of suspense, there were several scenes here (particularly towards the climax) that felt they should be far more suspenseful than they actually were. I didn't dislike the film and it kept my attention, I think I've just got used to Hitchcock delivering better than this. Perhaps now my expectations will be suitably lowered for his next film, then again, perhaps not.
-
I'm never going to get over when they were on the tractor and the background wasn't even moving while they were driving.
-
A few standout sequences but the majority is not especially interesting or thrilling.
-
Film #3 of the Paul Newman Project
This is the 3rd of the 46 Paul Newman movies I have seen this year. I was excited to watch this one in particular, as one of my favorite directors, Alfred Hitchcock directed this one. To my surprise, I found this movie to be amazing dull and the worst Newman (& Hitchcock) movie I have seen to date. I can not really fault Newman here. His performance was good (not one of his best). The story just seemed to drag and I found myself doing other things while I tried to watch through this film.
The film moves at a snail’s pace and never captivates, even during potentially dramatic scenes. Take a fight…
-
I actually attempted to watch Torn Curtain when I was very young, probably around the age of ten, but shut it off out of boredom. Well, time and age both bring clarity, as I managed to really like this movie. I never found myself bored, but actually became rather intrigued by the plot. I thought the lead performances were particularly good (it’s always a pleasure to watch Paul Newman), and many of the suspense sequences towards the end of the film represent great Hitchcock moments. I think the sequence at the farm though is the one that almost everyone, even the film’s detractors, will remember. Simply great film making.
-
Paul Newman and Julie Andrews go on a trip to Europe!
-
Decent spy thriller from Hitchcock. As most of the reviews on here state, the farmhouse scene is probably the best part of the movie.
-
I really enjoy Hitchcock movies. I really enjoy Paul Newman movies. I think Julie Andrews is one of the most beautiful women Hollywood has seen. When I heard of this film I thought I must see it.
This is an above average thriller from the "master" of suspense. However with this film I think the "master" was having a mediocre day. This film is twenty minutes too long. The overly "tense" scenes are actually overcooked and stop being tense about half way through each. Endless scenes of characters repeating themselves in an attempt to draw out the suspense just comes off as annoying. This is a great shame as the film has a lot going for it.
An above average thriller. One for people who already like Hitchcock. Not a film for people starting Hitchcock.