Friends often ask me to recommend indie horror films on Netflix Instant. (American Netflix, sorry!) Now I can just send…
This collection is killer.
When a group of misfits is hired by an unknown third party to burglarize a desolate house and acquire a rare VHS tape, they discover more found footage than they bargained for.
V/H/S blends one of the newer fads in horror - the shaky found footage movie - with one of the oldest - the portmanteau anthology. It is an interesting blend, on paper at least, allowing the hottest new indie directors to flex their creative muscles in shorter form films whilst tackling a range of horror sub-genres. Unfortunately the results are far less interesting than the film’s potential. Rather than utilising the strengths of the portmanteau structure - allowing for wildly different stories with great hooks and twists - it merely accentuates the problem with the current trend of found footage stories.
Although the film works its way through most sub-genres of horror (vampires, stalkers etc.) all the self-contained stories are…
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
So basically every story in this anthology plays out in the exact same way:
-Introduction of characters
- A bit of walking around
- Some groovy camera angles to enhance the found footage feel
- The teeniest tiniest bit of suspense
- Some yummie and scrumptious gore
All in all there were two stories I really liked, the third one because it is rather insane and the fourth one because it is actually creepy and weird. The rest is instantly forgettabe.
Usually in anthologies there is a common theme or connecting thread. The only one I could find here is that apparently everyone involved bought crappy cameras and suffered from Parkinson's disease.
VHS is everything I hate about modern horror films. Character building is replaced by shallow jump-scares, tension is replaced by boredom, shaky-cam is used to up the fear when in reality it serves to obscure and distract the viewer from the action. I am certainly no horror expert, but at least films like Psycho 2 and Scream 4 attempt to tell a cohesive narrative. VHS thinks that it is enough to just to have a shock nonsensical ending to superficial bite-size anthology segments. Ambiguity and surrealism is not, by itself, enough to make for an interesting story. Unfortunately, VHS is a blood-soaked CGI gore-fest that you will forget immediately after viewing - well I did at least. I also find…
Found footage horror films are my weakness and I don't even know why.
I don't even like that many of them but I keep watching them in the hope that I might find another [REC] - but usually they're more like Devil's Pass. I used to watch a LOT of horror films with my wife as we, for some reason, just ended up collecting any old thing we could get on DVD. As she tends to be working in the evenings now, we don't watch as many together so I've missed a lot of horror stuff, but I would definitely have watched V/H/S by now, whether it was supposed to be good or not!
V/H/S is a bit different from…
The idea of a horror anthology isn't a bad one. There could of been something really worth while here. Unfortunately there's only bits and pieces of quality within the the different segments and nothing works as a whole. I felt like I was getting glimpses of what could be a good horror story surrounded by a bunch of fluff that didn't scare, thrill, or even excite me. It's worth a look I suppose for the occasional flash of something good, but don't expect much and prepare to be underwhelmed.
Proper Stephen King compendium of quality horror shorts.
10/31/98 is great, but not much else.
I sort of enjoyed the first feature in V/H/S, along with the third (maybe fourth? whatever one had the glitchy woods phantom) but really the rest of it has already blended together and I'm having a tough time recalling details. As many others have made pointed out, the plot linking the anthology together is incredibly half baked and doesn't go anywhere or make any sense, and most of the segments felt that way too. V/H/S is a cool concept, though I think the directors would fair better working their ideas into full length movies, as some of them have already done with The House of the Devil and You're Next.
I would have rated it higher, but it gave me motion sickness.
The stories don't tie together which makes the framing story kind of pointless (unless maybe sequels go into this later on). The tone and quality of story varies from tape to tape, even some ending in unsatisfying ways. But I really do appreciate the creepy atmosphere and sense of dread each story was able to maintain... or maybe found footage is just something that has always been able to easily creep me out.
Great collection of horror shorts. Some are better than the others. Still a must see for horror fans
I generally like found-footage films. Unfortunately V/H/S just did not work for me. There were a couple of nice (brief) touches, but I just hated pretty much all of the characters. Usually with anthology films the stories are hit-and-miss, but this was just miss after miss after miss. Disappointing.
A horror compendium in which anyone with a vagina is a potential aggressor and anyone who can work After Effects is a veritable alchemist.
30% creepily effective / 70% utterly retarded
I've seen all these directors equip themselves much better when not egged on by their mates.
- 13 Sins
- 100 Bloody Acres
- All Cheerleaders Die
- Boogie Nights
- The Last King of Scotland
- Eastern Promises
- The Dreamers
- The Seventh Victim
- The Devils
- Carnival of Souls
- The Perfume of the Lady in Black
I must confess, I wouldn’t be as much of a movie fan as I am now if it weren’t for…