[after his parents have left, thinking he is ill] "They bought it. Incredible! One of the worst performances of my…
Who Can Kill a Child?
A nice place to visit, but you could never LIVE there!
A couple of English tourists arrive on an island where all the children have gone crazy and are murdering the adults.
When a film starts with real footage from various wars in which we see children suffering and dying, you know it's not going to be an 'easy' watch. And it isn't, not by a long shot.
What makes it stand out is not gore or easy scares, it's atmosphere. It evokes a feeling of 'wrongness', caused by the scariest antagonists possible, children. These kids do the most horrible things and therein lies the strength of this film. It's the disconnect between the rational expectations you have when you see a child and the sadistic things they eventually do. This slow realisation is acted out really well by the two leads. Even though I expected it, the inevitable conclusion still shocked me.
There is a lot to admire in this film, it has something to say, the acting is very good, but what I liked most is that it doesn't try to give any easy explanations.
This movie has developed quite the cult status over the years, I've heard this refered to multiple times as the greatest killer kid movie of all time, so expectations going in were high and they were met. This easily has the best atmosphere out of any of the nearly 60 horror movies I have watched since September starting off with that ghastly prologue that uses real life footage of atrocities to children.
From there the movie slowly draws you in to the lives of this tourist couple, we get little hints something isn't right but this movie really takes its time before it's big reveal which is very effective. The ending is grim brilliance. Edgy for any period in film…
They don't make them like this any more, seriously, they don't. Who Can Kill a Child is a really impressive piece of work in my eyes. This is a horror film that displays a perfect sense of timing and restraint and by developing slowly, builds an almost overwhelmingly eerie and tense atmosphere.
The film follows an English couple, Tom and Evelyn, as they holiday in Spain. To begin with, we see the couple in the busy town of Benavis where we learn Evelyn can't speak a word of Spanish, while Tom has visited previously and has a good command of the language. As there is a festival happening in town, Tom suggests they rent a boat and sail out to…
This won't be much of a review. This was my last film to watch to complete Hoop-Tober, and I finished it with 20 minutes till midnight on October 31st. At work. On my last day here. And it's an instant favorite. Today has been a good day :) Now I have to write about a billion reviews to complete this challenge and I'm sooooo tired. Maybe more like three or four, but still, I'll be lucky if they're legible. Anyway, this is my favorite of all the movies I watched for Hoop-Tober, and I really urge everyone to seek it out. That's all I want to say about it, because I don't think you should read about this before going into it if possible. Here's to a happy ending to Hoop-Tober on Halloween on my last night on the job. Can't beat that.
Now I am not sure which is scarier... being chased after by zombies or being chased by creepy little murdering kids.
Add me to the pile of folks that really don't understand the purpose of including that newsreel footage under the opening credits: The general intent of those clips -- children are mad as hell & they aren't gonna take it anymore -- is offered again mid-film (via more real-life footage), the in-your-face nature of those clips garishly clashes with the film's intelligent less-is-more aesthetic, and fuck showing actual Nazi / Vietnam atrocities in your silly little horror movie (especially when it's offset by a child's wordless singing).
Thankfully, the work of Serrador & friends in the rest of the film makes up for that misstep. In particular: The reveal of the first dead body (a simple non-showy camera pan accompanied by a…
Trigger warning: the opening credits of the film feature holocaust footage and other atrocity newsreels. After that it settles into a nice slow burn with a married couple (she's pregnant) on vacation at a remote island (is there any other kind?) where apparently there are no adults, only children. . . .who happen to be murderous little psychos.
Great suspense, this is a rare horror film to take place in complete sunlight (give or take a dark room). The cinematographer says in a DVD interview that they looked to The Birds and Night of the Living Dead for inspiration and I would say that that is spot on; I was thinking about NOTLD while watching parts of WCKAC.
This review reportedly contains spoilers. I can handle the truth.
The horrible, tragic newsreel footage at the beginning of this movie is exploitive and possibly unnecessary, but it sure does smash you over the head and force you into an unsettled frame of mind for the movie itself.
Once you get there, Who Can Kill A Child? is a damn good horror film. A lot of the creepiness comes from its use of broad daylight. There are some things off screen or chopped up in editing, but what you see is seen clearly, virtually without shadow (take the last scene, where he's just beating kids left and right). And the reverse-abortion (thanks for that description, internet) is amazing and terrifying.
Narciso Ibáñez Serrador's "¿Quién Puede Matar a un Niño?" is an exceptionally powerful horror movie. It begins with a truly disturbing sequence showing real life footage of war atrocities committed against children before segueing into the film proper and its more conventional storyline. Tom (Lewis Fiander) and his pregnant wife Evelyn (Prunella Ransome) are on holiday in Spain and decide to travel to the isolated island of Almanzora to get away from the hustle and bustle of the tourist resorts. They arrive to find no adults and a set of silent, glaring children playing at the quayside. Exploring the small island town they become increasingly concerned and worried. That worry soon grows into full-blown terror as they realise that the…
Caught this at a mystery screening at The Prince Charles Cinema and couldn't believe my luck. This bad boy has been on my watchlist for a considerable amount of time and I hadn't had much luck sourcing a copy.
Essentially this is Children of the Corn but set on a Spanish island. The opening credits use stock footage of world atrocities and the weight of Catholic guilt looms over the central premise, the script and performances are sketchy to say the least but despite its flaws WCKAC delivers enough tension and creepiness which perforate a couple of standout scenes.
Sadly though, the titular question is easily answered by a modern audience desensitised in the wake of multitudinous zombie and "infected" movies. I'd hazard a guess that most right minded and practical people could in fact kill this crazed, murderous little brats.
Starts out poorly, with 8 minutes of wartime atrocity footage over opening credits, then gets interesting with 20 minutes of near-documentary footage on the mainland, then gets to the main event, which is stranding our characters on an island with ... well, you can probably guess. Remarkable for its use of horror in broad daylight and for just how bleak it gets; dimly recalls PHASE IV in ways I won't spoil.
Hoop-tober 2.0 - Film 28/36
Well this was surprisingly well-realized. From some of the other things I had seen before watching this film, I had expected it to be much more trashy with its sensibilities, instead it plays things super straight. I mean it's more of a thriller than a horror movie, but I guess the thought of killing children is horrific enough for most people.
The use of silence and how it's used to almost contrast the intense shots of gore is particularly well utilized throughout. It takes a little while to really play it's hand though, and in a way I could see people being turned off by all the time spent establishing character or the way the…
A married couple take a trip to an island off the Spanish coast to find the children have killed almost all of the adults on the island.
I've seen the recent remake, Come Out and Play, so I was familiar with the story. The remake was actually fairly faithful to the original in plot, but it was missing all of the subtext.
The opening credits were intercut with wartime atrocity footage of murdered and starving children from around the world. Now, did the filmmakers need to include this? Probably not. Does it help underscore the fact that children are often victims of war? Sure, and in it's own heavy-handed way, it creates the equivalences of children as victims and adults as attackers. Even with everything that happens in the first 90 minutes, it is still difficult to watch Tom fighting back against the children.
Right off the bat, Who Can Kill a Child? suffers from having a lot of setup. And then a lot more setup. And then even more setup. Whether it's from pounding it into your head the overwhelming tragedy of the disproportionate level of deaths during wartime atrocities in a credit sequence that goes on and on and on and on, or news footage that does the same thing again, the film goes completely overboard with setting up the moral dilemma that will eventually play out for our poor tourists. Up until a scene with a pinata (well, a kind of pinata, anyway), I was really wondering if this was meant to be more of a tourist video for the town…
***EDIT (March 30, 2014)***
Wow! I never would have expected that I'd get anywhere close to 100 likes on this…
a list that is trying to contain every horror film made that is not lost and is found on the…