Week three of the Underrated Series and we get to the animation category. At least there shouldn't be any debate…
An epic fantasy of peace and magic.
An ambiguous battle between good and evil wages in a post-apocalyptic earth populated by netherworld creatures who have re-emerged after the nuclear winter. Two wizard twin brothers - the evil Blackwolf and the good Avatar - battle for supremacy. The war turns in Blackwolf's favor when he discovers the methods of warfare used by the ill-fated humans of the past.
Turns out a 15 year break from Ralph Bakshi gave me no further insight to his work, nor did my opinion of his work change in any way: I can appreciate it, but I don't actually like it.
Wizards is a mixed bag of of animation styles, characterizations, storylines, and odd soundtrack choices, all of which reeks of bad 70's dirt weed. The upside to cramming so much into your film is that some of it is bound to work.
By and large the movie looks great. The heroes tend to be really cartoon-y, but I'm willing to give that a pass for how cool the rest of it looks. I realize that the rotoscoping and stills and watercolor backgrounds…
Man, if any movie ever needed a video game adaptation, it would be this. You could either play on the side of magic or technology. The race choices would be elf, fairy, human, frogman, mutant, and hellspawn, and the classes would be wizard, warrior, assassin, and techno. That would be a kickass game.
If you can look past all the Nazi references and the weird “Science is bad, magic is the best” message then you will have a reasonable blast with this film. I personally subscribe to the theory of swords>guns, so I had no problem just going with it. I am also giving this film an extra half star for marking the first time in my life that I have ever jacked off to a cartoon fairy.
I've seen this movie multiple times and I still don't really know what it's about - I assume wizards, and there are some fairies, but also Nazis somehow, and...boobs? I like putting it on in the background when I'm doing other things, the animation and the soundtrack are great, and that for me is enough to gain my affections.
Podéis decir que es rancia, infantiloide, trasnochada, que el término "animación adulta" le viene grande, que es una amorfa mezcla de géneros, pero Gimme Bakshi or Gimme Death!!!
Ojalá a Pixar le creciesen los c*jones necesarios para hacer una cosa de estas.
Less ambitious than Bakshi's other movies I've seen in a lot of ways - the story is classical fantasy-quest type stuff for the most part (albeit with a whole bunch of swastikas thrown in), and the animation is a less abstract, flatter, and more TV-like. But it works for me, and there are a ton of cool visual ideas and, despite the more family-oriented tone, lots of Bakshi-style satire and commentary.
Was definitely not expecting the final showdown between the titular wizards to go that way.
Good futuristic fantasy from the late '70s. I don't like the visual style of anime which is probably why I appreciate animated movies like Wizards, Heavy Metal, and Fantastic Planet because they have a nice psychedelic aesthetic. Be sure to get in the right state of mind first if you're bout dat life.
This animated film is a survey of 70s science fiction tropes and underground comics delivered in a rough experimental style which is not consistently good. It has its moments but it is not going to win director Ralph Bakshi any new converts. If you recall the dawn of the midnight movie with nostalgia, you may love this quirky fantasy but trust me it is rather slight.
Pretty lame and disappointing. Too adult for the young set and too childish for a discerning audience. I can see the film appealing to middle school kids who have only seen Disney and are looking for something "subversive". The film is hardly subversive, however, except in its aesthetic style and innovative animation which deserves all the accolades it has received.
The content, however, is exceptionally poor. The metaphors are cringingly obvious. The voice acting horribly cast. The characters are all irritating or unlikable. At best the film is awkward and at worst embarrassing.
Bakshi said he made the film in order to prove he could make a "family film" that had the same impact as his family films. Instead he continued to prove that he could create a cult favorite that appeals to a niche audience only. I don't begrudge fealty to the film but I can't find any common ground on which to join the faithful.
It's really not very good, but there's quite a bit of bizarre and memorable imagery.
Not to be too blunt about this, but it really just comes across as an unfinished work-print or a demo on how the final product is intended to look. And I know that Bakshi lacked the funding of this particular film so he had to use rotoscoping for the battle scenes. But still, the rest of the animation just isn't up to snuff either. It's jerky, lip-syncing is non-existent and the backgrounds at times are just cheap, grainy footage of glowing smoke with a character awkwardly animated in front of it.
Not to mention that the plot is just the bare bones of what you could call a fantasy story. The pacing here is terrible, stuff just happens because hey,…
- The King and the Mockingbird
- When the Wind Blows
- The Hand
- The Cat With Hands
- Mind Game
- The Brood
- Winter Light
- The Changeling
No idea if there is a list for this yet, but I think I will keep this as kind of…
- The Lost World
- The Old Dark House
- Island of Lost Souls
- King Kong
I decided not to clog this with Disney and Pixar. I imagine you see those whether you plan to or…