The Dark Knight Rises 2012 ★★

Watched Jul 20, 2012

After seven years and three films, Nolan’s Batman journey is over. The question is, is The Dark Knight Rises the send off the trilogy deserves? Sadly the answer to that question is a crushing no. Having re-watched both previous films this week I can say without a shadow of a doubt that this is the weakest film of the trilogy, and to make things worse, it isn’t even a good film, period.

In many ways the film’s problems existed throughout the series - needlessly long, inconsistent pacing and incoherent and bitty plotting - yet here they are magnified, partly because they are at their very worst and partly because it also lacks the compelling characters and exciting set pieces that papered over the cracks in the earlier movies. What we are left with is a bloated film with woeful pacing, a menagerie of new characters you care little about and even action that, whilst still on a grand scale, is devoid of spectacle.

As with the rest of the series the film looks and sounds amazing. The special effects are nearly faultless and the extended use of IMAX cameras really pays off. Yet all the pretty pictures in the world can’t hide the fact that this is a leaden story that lacks cohesion. Nolan’s Batman have always had scattershot plots that, on occasion, overreach themselves. Here is no different. You have many new elements thrown into the mix be it characters, plot devices or themes (the current economic crisis is clumsily shoe-horned into the story) but nothing really hangs together in a satisfying way, no matter how much they try and tie the entire trilogy together. The first hour is incredibly heavy handed in its use of on-the-nose expositional dialogue that you are just waiting for the film to finally find its feet yet it never really does.

The stakes may have never been higher but it didn’t stop the film from dragging from start to finish. There is urgency in the plot but that rarely materialises in the way Nolan has paced the film. When Bane reveals his dastardly plan you are expecting it to take off yet the monotonous pacing continues trudging along and the only thing that does increase is how often you check your watch.

Tom Hardy is one of the finest actors of his generation yet he really struggles here as Bane. He may be a beast of a man but his character is decidedly uninteresting and the further tweaks to his voice hinder his impact as a genuine threat. In fact he never even sounds like he is delivering the dialogue which creates a strange disconnect. Anne Hathaway’s morally ambiguous Selina Kyle is decidedly flat too with her good-bad dilemma being played out in the most banal and predictable manner. Joseph Gordon-Levitt has perhaps the most interesting arc of the new characters but frankly I’d have been happier if he’d been cut entirely to help with the arse-numbing runtime. The most telling thing about the film and the characters that populate it is that Michael Caine steals the film with only a few minutes screen time.

I really wish I could find more positives but it is a struggle. Even the action is disappointingly forgettable. Compare any scene with the truck flip, bat pod reveal or bank heist from The Dark Knight and this comes up short; way short. There are sequences here that should, theoretically, be spectacular yet they are not. Shooting so much in broad daylight doesn’t help but, once again, the main culprit is the pacing. They lack an ebb and flow that pulls you in and gets you on the edge of your seat with the only time I moved in my seat being when my bum cheeks had fallen asleep.

I wanted to love it but this was not the send-off Nolan and his team deserved. The Dark Knight Stumbles.

95 Comments

  • I have and I really enjoyed it (my review is up on the site if you want to read it).

  • @adam: what else have you reviewed

  • I review everything I watch so quite a bit. Here is a list of the most popular reviews.

  • i will have a look you can check my reviews too if you want

  • i checked it out and I skimmed it, but the bits i saw like you said they seemed to enjoy themselves I have to agree with this i shall read the rest of it later and i think the baddie was not that scary
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZkqC4Lz8dU

  • Excellent review and except for the Bane part I agree with you in all points as I thought Tom Hardy did an excellent job, although he did suffer from the story itself.

    I do think the movie suffers a bit from being the third movie in the trilogy and as a movie on its own it would probably have been rated as very good by most. (I like the dark and gritty feeling Nolan has created in his Batman films compared to most other comic films) but after seeing Batman Begins and then especially The Dark Knight, this movie ends up being a disappointment. In the end it felt like a remake of Batman Begins, and sadly it deserved better.

  • Thanks, Sigurhjörtur.

    RE Hardy's performance: Whilst I was underwhelmed by Bane the vast majority of the disappointment stems from the writing, the distancing effect of the voice and the mask which meant he could only really use his body and eyes. Most actors would have struggled with the constraints he had.

  • Couldn't agree more with your review. A real shame and a let down for the finale or the trilogy. For me, The Dark Knight is by far the best of the three, perhaps, as you say, because of the characters - particularly and obviously, Heath Ledger's Joker.

  • Thanks. My personal favourite is still Begins or at least it is the one I am happiest to watch again and again.

  • Great review of a disappointing mess.

Please to comment.