review by Marcin Wichary
Kill Bill: Vol. 2 2004
Watched Jan 25, 2012
Marcin Wichary’s review:
There are two types of people: those who prefer the first part of Kill Bill, and those who never got to the second part because the first part scared them away.
I jest, of course, but it was close; the first part left me a bit disappointed. It wasn’t unlike that guy who tries Red Bull for the first time – entertaining, for sure, but a bit monotone. It was the second half which felt much more whole as a film.
Still, I can’t help but think this duet of movies was not really meant for me. Just like I can recognize and revel in all the inside jokes and references in the nerdy productions, I came to Kill Bill largely unfamiliar with all the inspiration here: martial art flicks, exploitation movies, spaghetti westerns, and the like.
Without all that fabric these are still fun, but somewhat hollow movies. Nice fight choreography, fun non-linear chronology, great use of sound, too much violence and even more anxiety – down to the genius of chapter titles telegraphing cruel events to come. Biggest puzzle? In Tarantino universe, kids have selective deafness.
I'm one of those people who feel that Kill Bill has to be taken as a duo; seeing one without the other takes away either the story or the stylish blood fest that endeared the films to me. But it's definitely a genre film, and sometimes it seems to go too far into the pastiche.
It was originally meant to be one long movie, right…?
It's one long movie for me. I love them both for different reasons. I love the action in part 1 and the dialogue in part 2. The entire Superman monologue Bill gives The Bride at the end of part 2 was a show steeler for me. Bring on part 3 please. :)
Wikipedia claims there might be more parts, and since it's Wikipedia, you know it must be true!
LOL i bloody hope so too. :)