Martha Marcy May Marlene 2011 ★★★½

Watched Jun 25, 2012

The last time I saw John Hawkes in something was in Me And You And Everyone We Know and as is the case with everyone who was involved with that film, they are all guilty by association with Miranda July. I am prepared to hear the case to absolve him of his crime after Martha Marcy May Marlene, however.

This psychological drama, which sees Elizabeth Olsen fleeing from a secluded cult and taking refuge with her sister and her husband but continuing to be haunted by flashbacks to her time there, is a real slow-burner. Director Sean Durkin is quite happy to go nowhere fast for long stretches of the film, which is fair enough as it is a slight tale that actually does not have a huge amount to say.

What it does say, though, is very palatable for the most part and the story is a plausible one that is well told by an excellent assortment of performances. Elizabeth Olsen is exceptional in easily the most difficult role in the film and on the basis of this performance alone she has to be marked out as a truly great new talent. Hawkes is excellent, too, albeit in a less tricky role, while Sarah Paulson and Hugh Dancy are good as the sister and brother in law.

I couldn't help but feel right the way through that there was something bubbling under here that could easily turn Martha Marcy May Marlene into an outright classic. It just seemed to be missing something, whether it was the back-story as to why Olsen joined the cult in the first place or the actual motives of its leader, Hawkes. It's almost as if Durkin pulls back at the odd crucial moment and is far more happy to let the film continue along its fairly pedestrian pace.

That said, he could easily have botched the ending and I was glad that we were spared some hysterical siege ending for something that was rather more ambiguous. That's not to say I was fully satisfied by the ending, and it did not have the impact that I personally wanted, but it was certainly better than I expected.

I wouldn't say that Martha Marcy May Marlene is flawed by any means, because it really isn't. It just felt as though greatness was within its grasp but that it never really tried to reach for it. I don't blame Durkin for this in only his first feature length film, however, and it's still a fine film that says to me that he will certainly be one to watch.

6 Comments

  • John Hawkes was excellent in the recent Winter's Bone too.

  • To be fair to him, he was very good in Me And You.... as well, it was just the film itself that was just, well, you know.

    I have got Winter's Bone on my watchlist, might bump it up a few notches, thanks.

  • Another vote for Winter's Bone. And John Hawkes, I love him in Deadwood.

    I agree with you, I thought MMMM was missing something, but I couldn't quite put my finger on what that something was. For me maybe, I questioned whether her character really made sense - she seemed so strong and independent in the early flashbacks, and even though the background causality appeared to be there (the abandonment and mistrust from family), I didn't really buy it.

    I was really satisfied by the ending though. After a moment of shock, I thought it made the most sense.

    If you're interested, I found this interview with the filmmakers to be really interesting.

  • Cheers for that, Julie, I'll watch that tomorrow morning!

  • Count me in as another who thought the film lacked something. To be fair, it was being compared to Winter's Bone (one of my faves) a lot at TIFF so I my expectations were quite high. I really liked MMMM, but I thought perhaps what was lacking was dramatic tension. There were two dramatic moments in the entire film and one of them was awful (the dinner table scene where her sister and brother-in law over react --and overact). That was the only scene I felt was out of place and over done. I'm all for slow meandering character study type films, but the better ones tend to include dramatic tension throughout, something that Winter's Bone had in spades even in the slow parts.

  • I wasn't sold by the dinner table scene either, I have to admit. I wasn't overly convinced by some aspects of her behaviour as well and I would have liked more analysis of that. I think the film should really have been about 20 minutes longer.

Please to comment.