RSS feed for Silent J
  • 101 Dalmatians 1961

    ★★★★ Rewatched 14 Aug, 2012

    *Part of Disney Project*

    The premise is a lot like that in Lady and the Tramp: not much of a big plot, but it's got dogs doing cute stuff. Oddly enough, I like this a lot more than Lady and the Tramp (which speaking of, if you pay close attention, there are some nice subtle cameos from some of the dogs in that film like Jock, Lady, and Tramp). Maybe it's the nostlagia from when I used to watch this…

  • 10 Items or Less 2006

    ★★★½ Added

    Morgan Freeman and Paz Vega play off of each other well in this simple yet charming gem.

  • 10 Years 2012

    ★★★★ Watched 22 Apr, 2013 4

    Last year, I think we can all agree Channing Tatum had a great year. Like many, he impressed in outings like 21 Jump Street, Haywire, and Magic Mike. He continues to impress in probably the more overlooked film he did last year, 10 Years.

    The plot is simple...just a bunch of former high school buddies getting together 10 years later for a reunion. Thanks to the cast, it's effective. You've got some really great performances from a great ensemble cast…

  • 127 Hours 2010

    ★★★★★ Added 10

    Who knew that watching James Franco stuck to a rock for 90 minutes could not only be so interesting but so amazing?

  • 12 Years a Slave 2013

    ★★★★★ Added

    This film is the very definition of historically inaccurate. There's no way Solomon Northcup could have spent 12 years as a slave.

    Everybody knows that Django saved all the slaves and abolished slavery way, way, way, way, way back in the day after he was unchained by the great King Schultz. Solomon may have spent some months in chains, but Django saved him way before that counter hit 12 years.

    GOD. Quentin Tarantino should have directed this film because Steve McQueen clearly doesn't know his facts.

  • 13 2010

    ★★ Watched 08 Mar, 2012

    While this film does have a fair share of problems (some pointless characters, predictable, annoying repeated score, lazy writing) but there are at least a few things I liked. This film is well cast, well acted, and has some pretty suspenseful scenes. That's about it. Still, it was better than I thought it would be, even if that is'nt saying much. Apparantly there is an original that I am yet to see. Can someone tell me if that is any good?

  • 13 Going On 30 2004

    ★★★★ Added 5

    A fun, funny guilty pleasure. An unoriginal plot (think the female version of Big) made enjoyable by a surprisingly charming Jennifer Garner who gives a surprisingly good performance. Her best in my opinion. Nice cast that includes Judy Greer and, oddly enough, Andy Serkis. Believe it or not, this was my first introduction to Mark Ruffalo and I've been a fan of the guy ever since. Loved the Thriller dance sequence. Great soundtrack. Touching and often hilarious.

  • 16 Blocks 2006

    ★★★★ Watched 06 Sep, 2012 39

    This is a better Die Hard sequel than Die Hard's 2, 4, and 5 (I don't care if that last one hasn't come out yet; it's gonna suck).

    If this was titled "Die Hard 4 or 5", this would be a great finale to the franchise, but it still manages to be great on it's own, especially thanks to Bruce Willis giving his best John McClane performance since Die Hard and probably the best performance he's given.

  • 17 Again 2009

    ★★★★ Added 3

    I've got to admit something...

    I actually like Zac Efron as an actor. I think he's a really talented guy. He may not choose some of the best projects to showcase that talent, but he's great in this film and if he keeps this up, he could have a great career ahead of him.

    There, I said it.

  • 187 1997

    ★★★★ Added

    When Samuel L. Jackson isn't self-paroding himself by screaming, cursing, and trying to be the Bad Mutha Fucka we all know he is, what happens?

    He delivers a commanding, subtle, and excellent performance in a powerful, complex, and shocking drama.

  • 2001: A Space Odyssey 1968

    ★★★★★ Added

    Simply epic.

  • 200 Cigarettes 1999

    ★★ Watched 02 Aug, 2012

    The cast may look impressive, but the acting is a mixed bag. You get some good performances (Janeane Garofalo, Paul Rudd, Martha Plimpton) and you get some bad ones (Courtney Love, Ben Affleck, Kate Hudson, everyone else). Dave Chappelle is hilarious and stole the show. You can take that as either he's just that good or the cast is just that bad. Whether the actors are good or bad doesn't really matter because the characters are such empty and cliched…