Synopsis
Pass the warning.
Laura and John, grieved by a terrible loss, meet in Venice, where John is in charge of the restoration of a church, two mysterious sisters, one of whom gives them a message sent from the afterlife.
1973 Directed by Nicolas Roeg
Laura and John, grieved by a terrible loss, meet in Venice, where John is in charge of the restoration of a church, two mysterious sisters, one of whom gives them a message sent from the afterlife.
Ne gledaj sada, Venecia rojo shocking, Nu privi acum, Avdøde advarer, Akai Kage, Wenn die Gondeln Trauer tragen, А сега не гледай, Amenaça a l'ombra, Rødt chok, Μετά τα Μεσάνυχτα, Amenaza en la sombra, Ne vous retournez pas, המבט, Ne nézz vissza!, Villur vegar, A Venezia... un dicembre rosso shocking, 赤い影, 쳐다보지 마라, Nie oglądaj się teraz, Inverno de Sangue em Veneza, Aquele Inverno em Veneza, Nu te uita acum, А теперь не смотри, Rösten från andra sidan, Karanlığın Gölgesi, Đừng Nhìn Bây Giờ, 威尼斯疑魂, 威尼斯痴魂
Horror, the undead and monster classics Intense violence and sexual transgression Thrillers and murder mysteries horror, creepy, eerie, blood or gothic scary, horror, creepy, supernatural or frighten horror, creepy, eerie, frighten or chilling thriller, psychological, suspense, twist or disturbing horror, gory, scary, killing or gruesome Show All…
For me, the most terrifying scene in Don't Look Now is a testament to Nicolas Roeg's direction, Scott and Bryant's script, and Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie's skill as actors as the scene itself is nowhere near traditionally frightening, and out of context seems almost bland and/or relieving. The scene in question occurs after Sutherland's Baxter chases what he thinks to be his wife across Venice, only to call home to England and find she had arrived safe and sound earlier that day. The scene was terrifying not in that I wondered what kind of phantom he had seen, but in the absolute strangeness of the performances across the phone lines. Christie's voice is too-assuring and virtually prattles on that…
Don't you love it when a film completely brings its respective story into full focus? Don't Look Now, for much of its run-time, was meandering and boring at points. I found it hard to stay invested into the story, but there was always a new development to make sure I didn't turn it off. And then, the final 10 minutes happened....
I don't think I've had an opinion of a film change so fast. Truly, as Don't Look Now had its end credits rolling, I was unsettled beyond belief. Eyes darting, hearing every sound, seeing every shadow, sensing every presence; The only cure for how freaking scared I was as a result of the film was sleep.
So, here I…
"If the world is round, why is a frozen lake flat?"
I can't get a grip on why this has never worked for me. Perhaps its phantasmagoria is too grounded, too rooted in a very pragmatic British skepticism. Even given all the curlicue editing and repeated motifs, I don't think it ever truly succumbs to irrationality. Its final twist never seems unexpected or out-of-balance to me. I keep wanting it to go truly over the edge. It's all my problem, apparently.
This is the only movie I’m sure I’ll be putting on my Sight and Sound all time ballot, and knowing this has prompted me to re-examine my criteria (and maybe rewatch Don’t Look Now, not that I ever need an excuse).
I can’t say that Don’t Look Now is the best film I’ve ever seen; I don’t even think it’s flawless. The long section after Julie Christie goes back to England and Sutherland skulks around in between meetings with the local authorities is finally essential to Roeg’s structure, but it’s draggy compared to the amazingly pressurized scenes that precede it; I personally love the staging of the finale, but enough other people find it lacking or laughable that I have…
This has got to be one of the best ghost stories ever made. It is not scary, but has an unsettling atmosphere as it doesn't intend to scare you, but to make you part of a man's desperate attempt to make sense of a situation he doesn't (want to) understand.
Firmly rooted in realism, Roeg tells a tale of grief and love. The strength of this story lies in the fact that Sutherland and Christie portray a couple that comes across as genuine. Their predicament is easy to sympathise with and to invest in, granting us an emotional connection which in turn automatically makes us part of their plight. Feeling so connected to a story as unsettling and intriguing as…
me, knowing full well that donald and kiefer sutherland are related: wow this fella sure looks an awful lot like kiefer sutherland
Chilling to see how an adult handles the theme of grief through the lens of horror. Would've been badass if any of the 900 movies that tried the same trick took the lesson of this movie to not beat your audience over the head with it and instead let it just seep up through the cracks. But that's life I guess. It was probably pretty hard to make this movie or at least to live the kind of life that would lead up to making this movie.
Lotta reviews on here saying this demands a rewatch and I guess I get what you mean but I think it's to the film's credit that I feel pretty "set" on this one…
an esoteric, metaphysical study contemplating on mortality and grief as one, ‘Don’t Look Now’ adverses the average inductors of cinematic displaying by exonerating the audience of any sort of refutes until the indubitably mesmerising finale, which is masterfully foreshadowed, juxtapositioning disbelief and recognition upon the viewer simultaneously. and even though the engrossingly transfixing conclusion to the film asserts reassurance, some questions remain (purposefully) unanswered.
this ingredient is utilised at the movie’s advantage with such masterful manures - as in order to be thoroughly and utterly engulfed into the hypnotically pernicious actuality ‘Don’t Look Now’ embellishes, the audience must feel the unforgiving need for the ongoing clues made visible by the precise direction to be acknowledged, answered. the movie though, no…