Synopsis
Passion. Power. Revenge. In All Their Majesty.
In 1960s China, French diplomat Rene Gallimard falls in love with an opera singer, Song Liling - but Song is not at all who Gallimard thinks.
1993 Directed by David Cronenberg
In 1960s China, French diplomat Rene Gallimard falls in love with an opera singer, Song Liling - but Song is not at all who Gallimard thinks.
Jeremy Irons John Lone Barbara Sukowa Ian Richardson Annabel Leventon Shizuko Hoshi Richard McMillan Vernon Dobtcheff David Hemblen Damir Andrei Antony Parr Margaret Ma Tristram Jellinek Philip McGough David Neal Sean Hewitt Peter Messaline Michael Mehlmann Barbara Chilcott George Jonas Carl Zvonkin Viktor Fülöp Cadman Chui María Teresa Uribe Harriet Chung Monica Gan Ayumi Komoda Tammy Lok Tracey Oh Show All…
M Butterfly
Humanity and the world around us Moving relationship stories Epic history and literature emotion, emotional, moving, sadness or feelings romance, emotion, relationships, feelings or captivating historical, royalty, sumptuous, lavish or drama sex, sexual, relationships, erotic or sensual emotion, storytelling, powerful, poetic or captivating Show All…
A film about Western imperialism and the cultural revolution, David Cronenberg-style!
This film implies that America's disastrous escalation of the Vietnam war was because of one horny French diplomat whose affair with a Chinese opera singer led him to project his own fantasy of the exotic orient and Asian submissiveness into his intelligence briefings. There's a lot more going on in this one. A brutal and gut-wrenching look at how much of what we regard as love between men and women is an artifice that each person builds out of the other.
"You are all here because you do not know how to dig into the flinty soil of China and discover its revolutionary future."
We have induced this dysmorphia with our aggressive privilege, our delusion, and our occasional delight in taking what we want when it suits us, only to be seduced, consumed and finally abandoned by the power and potential of this transformation.
"He was very responsive to my ancient Oriental ways of love, all of which I invented just for him."
If this intended to have some sort of commentary on the racist perceptions of Europeans/Americans in China, it failed, mixing a little bit of awareness of stereotypes and with straight depictions of other stereotypes. The writer knows the words "imperialism" and "reactionary" but never once shows the impact of imperialism (instead, we more or less find if not sympathy then less contempt for imperialists here than for communism) and the truth of reactionaries' ideologies (i.e., fascism, etc.). It simply throws the vocabulary around for flavor while demonizing China with a shallow depiction of the political climate at the time. For all the talk of the French losing "Indochina" and the Americans' intentions to bomb, not once is it really acknowledged…
shouldn't be missed out on in any gender patriarchal hegemonial colonial class all over the western world. Cronenberg anticipated all our contemporary updated discourses in his body cinema early on anyhow.
an overlong elegiacal pre-story ends in brutal consequences, when perversion, passion and desire (and the own transgression) aren't assimilable, pushed into denial and a schizophren gender turn of self-destruction makes for a lofty finale.
Action!: The Many Bodies Of One David Cronenberg
Cronenberg and Irons team up again for another subtle take on the body genre, where there might be not disgusting horror and imagery, but more of a transformation with political and social ties-in. This, by now, has to be the most endearing and touching movie made by David, something that he will unfortunately not repeat. The script does a great job illustrating the very own themes in the play and translating them into the relationships between these two. Making you wonder whether whose the slave and whose the owner, plus setting this all against the backdrop of the Chinese revolution was perfect. Last but not least, Howard Shore score here isn't very…
M. Butterfly. 1993. Directed by David Cronenberg.
DNA’s 600th Review:
For our 600th review, we chose David Cronenberg’s M. Butterfly because it is an LGBTQ story and this is pride month. M. Butterfly’s attraction to David Cronenberg was strong because he had seen the play and he was convinced that he was the correct director because his films focused on identity and metamorphosis. The Fly (1986) and Dead Ringers (1988) focused on gender and identity specifically. Of course Crimes of the Future (2022) is also about identity, freedom to use one’s body or modify one’s body without Government interference (e.g. The National Organ Registry) but it had not been made. My point is David Cronenberg has always made films that were…
David Cronenberg's film adaptation of David Henry Hwang's play; itself entwined with the opera Madame Butterfly. The film depicts a relationship between a French diplomat and a beautiful opera singer. It's a relationship apparently based on love, but actually based on lies. The film is deliberately paced for much of the runtime, despite that it is a truncated version of the stage play. The original plot of Madame Butterfly reaches across the narrative of this film, though many aspects are twisted and subverted. The narrative is enthused with points about Western Imperialism and cultural differences between East and West but the film has far more interesting things to say about the nature of love. Once the twist is revealed, the…
"It's not the story, it's the music."
Recently got to see Cronenberg's The Fly again, and was struck by how romantic and beautiful it is, despite the monster movie trappings. Here he does something even more sumptuous and mysterious, and I got almost as swept up in it as I did with The Fly - which makes sense because in broad strokes the two aren't really so different after all. They're both about arrogant men who get transformed into something terrifying, and also like The Fly, The Butterfly is only terrifying depending on your perspective.