Synopsis
One man will make a mistake. The other will make it a spectacle.
A misguided museum guard who loses his job and then tries to get it back at gunpoint is thrown into the fierce world of ratings-driven TV gone mad.
1997 Directed by Costa-Gavras
A misguided museum guard who loses his job and then tries to get it back at gunpoint is thrown into the fierce world of ratings-driven TV gone mad.
John Travolta Dustin Hoffman Mia Kirshner Alan Alda Robert Prosky Blythe Danner William Atherton Ted Levine Milton Davis Jr. Bill Nunn John Landis William O'Leary Jay Leno Lucinda Jenney Tammy Lauren Kyla Pratt Raymond J. Barry Akosua Busia Ebbe Roe Smith Scanlon Gail Charlie Holliday Kevin Cooney Susan Segal Richard Portnow Michèle-Barbara Pelletier Velina Brown Patricia Smith Richard Gross Allan A. Apone
It's reasonably entertaining and has a few interesting ideas but "Mad City" is an overly familiar thriller that runs out of gas about halfway through. The tone is all over the place and it essentially feels like two different movies. Dustin Hoffman is really solid but John Travolta sadly feels miscast and it only skims the surface of the themes it's attempting to explore. Watchable enough but there's a reason this is pretty forgotten.
This Travolta performance is so dead on arrival, so muted and closed off yet schticky and showy at the same time. It has all the Pacino in Dog Day nervous energy but zero insight or discovery into who this man is and why he's doing what he's doing. He's actually closer to Rain Man than Pacino, which is odd that he's paired with Hoffman. And they're terrible together. It's like they never even look at each other in the film. They're in totally separate films. And the story is playing off of media exploitation and falling flat where Dog Day sang, and then a bomb goes off and Dustin Hoffman's stuntman falls down the museum steps in slow motion and it's clearly not Hoffman and it's a total wet noodle yawnfest.
Mad City is a strange offering coming from Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta: for one, it is not very memorable for various reasons, the direction of the film is borderline stale and too pedestrian & the film, as a whole, is weak that it is not surprising that it didn't do well at the box office. What I did like was that Travolta's character wasn't a complete and total evil loon.
Sam Bailey is a former security guard who had just lost his job, which he wants back. He accidentally kills a security guard and with that, he feels terribly guilty about what he has done & feels his life is completely ruined. Max Brackett is a news reporter, who is covering…
5/10
This movie was just ridiculous. However it's basically like cinematic junk food. There is some enjoyment to it. It's always nice to see Dustin Hoffman in a movie because he's so natural. Travolta.....really tries. A little too goofy and preachy at times.
Interesting but a bit too broadly satirical film, as a recently fired security guard played by Travolta takes his boss and a group of visiting children hostage in the museum he worked in. The situation gets manipulated by Hoffman's reporter who uses the situation to further his career. Quite quickly Travolta's character becomes subservient to Hoffman's savvy figure, teaching him the tricks of appearing well on television. Yet eventually even the situation is taken out of his control as a more distinguished reporter figure swoops in to take over the situation and destroy both Travolta and Hoffman at the same time.
This is a film that really wants to be the 90s version of classic 70s films, particularly Dog Day…
Although Hoffman and Alda give the sort of strong performance you would expect, Travolta is sadly limp and weary. There's no real suspense, and there's nothing meaningful said about the media nor society that Network hadn't already pointed out over 20 years previously.
Watched as part of my assignment!
Mad City looks very simple and little goofy during the first hour. There is an unrealistic situation, characters that seem one-dimensional and a bit overacting John Travolta. The dialogues doesn’t seem good too sometimes. However, it is still exciting to watch as there is Dustin Hoffman who really takes all the attention. His character Max Brackett is confident, competent, have some great lines and is really believable as a journalist. Also the humour is really good.
The film definitely improves during the second half as it becomes more satirical, there appears to be a serious conflict and the main duo have some really dynamic relationship which culminates in an unexpectedly solid ending.
If you are interested in watching more films about journalism, this film is undoubtfully is a recommendation as it perfectly shows how media could manipulate people. Also a decent performance of Dustin Hoffman as a journalist really shows.
Hoffman is always strong when he's a character facing a moral compass dilemma, and in this he shines, but despite his best efforts Travolta's Sam Baily feels stale from the start which drops this one off from where it could be.
//T E C H N I C A L E S C A L A T I O N//
the massaging of entertainment and manipulation of perception
human stories are the core of entertainment and the perpetuation of the rolling ball of history that defines our existence, but achieving digestibility and connexion is what drives storytellers. the media can be a projection of good but it can also be a hungry fist, throttling privacy and decency. it can be the leak in a roof that causes dryrot or a hole in the window that whistles with a cool wind, keeping you up all night. the purity of human stories and struggles cant confide in the juttering, jagged wheels of approval…
20th Anniversary of Mad City today. I have never seen this film before today. I must have been too busy seeing Starship Troopers on its opening night. John Travolta (his third 1997 film and still hot off Pulp Fiction) plays Sam Baily, an ex-museum security guard who returns to his place of work and takes his former boss (Blythe Danner) and a number of children hostage, armed with a shotgun and a bag of dynamite. Dustin Hoffman (who just turned 80 earlier this year) plays a reporter who basically controls the situation and manipulates it to his advantage. He also sympathizes with him somewhat and coaches him through the predicament. Costa-Gavras was the director here (his second English language film)…
When we are increasingly out of touch with reality but in tune with 'real time', live tv news feedback etc then there's barely an economic compensation if any at all just like reality, distorting to vanish by the end. I also heard complaints about Travolta not catching enough attention for being, virtually and unusually, a supporting actor during this whole movie but I can only attribute this to how people can't accept the stupidity of his character which he ennacts convincingly enough. I doubt this is Costa-Gavras masterpiece but it isn't as bad as people pretend it is or could have been.
There's a good idea in Mad City but it fails to live up to its promise.
Dustin Hoffman is tremendous value as Max Brackett, a scuzzy reporter who accidentally finds himself trapped in a museum when a hostage situation is unwittingly started by fired security guard Sam Bailey (John Travolta). Beckett gleefully manipulates the situation to his advantage but soon finds himself up against America's biggest anchorman (played by a brilliant Alan Alda) who wants to manipulate the story to his own end.
Sadly Travolta isn't very believable in his role, and while he's full of wired energy, he never quite comes off as the simple, but idealistic provider he's trying so hard to convey.
There's a solid story about how the media manipulates situations so they're never to the advantage of the people or events they are portraying, but because this is Hollywood prime time it ultimately lacks any real bite.
With celebrated leading/character actors at every turn this film is packed with talent as it navigates a somewhat exaggerated depiction of the lengths a reporter(s) will go to cover a story. Mad City manages to entertain with shark like charm while it weaves a simple tale with a deeper message.
The film is lengthy at two hours but you really wouldn’t notice. The action, while slow and middling, truly comes (quite artfully) with the outside world reacting to what occurs inside the museum. The performances of Travolta and Hoffman are pivotal to the success of the impact of events. From start to finish this film is carried by their emotion and they don’t disappoint.
While Mad City exhibits accelerated character…
Очень увлекательный и необычный камерный фильм, основные события которого проходят внутри музея между случайным преступником и некогда популярным журналистом, которых судьба закинула в данные обстоятельства.
Журналист в исполнении Дастина Хоффмана всячески пытается помочь преступнику в исполнении Джона Траволты выйти из сложившейся ситуации, освободить всех заложников и получить расположение телезрителей, которые следят за ситуацией по телевизору.
You can’t tell me otherwise, John Travolta is a talented actor and a fantastic leading man.
This film was buried, hard to find in any standard search. Somehow, searching through IMDB, I stumbled upon it and I’m glad I tracked it down and rented it - for 1.99. Worth it.
Hoffman is superb, Alda also great, but Travolta as he usually is in the 80s and 90s gems I’ve found is great as expected. The guy is electric, always the most interesting thing on the screen.
This little 90s gem is riddled with some great bits and one liners, some solid Mel Gibson digs and is overall a great 90s dramatic thriller. Emphasis on the dramatic.
seen it before but forgotten all of it. its trying to say something about the disenfranchised, lower class, lower intelligence and the dangers of a breaking point. about the blights of fame or maybe rather the things a person will do to get fame. its not poignant at all though as we get a doofy travolta trying to pull off complex emotions like first year acting class, and then you get hoffman doing his mumbling clever man routine to a T all while manipulating the situation into tragedy and then the film wants us to feel sorry for him. i wasnt really picking up what it was putting down despite it trying real hard..
Hershey 20,912 films
I’m sick of sorting through concerts, series, and other non-movies. Anything with more than 1,000 views on Letterboxd that’s longer…
MundoF 16,716 films
UNDER CONSTRUCTION This is a lot of work - and will take a lot of time - because I need…
Tyler Jirinec-Parker 1,261 films
Films that I believe are underrated, under-seen, not talked about enough or that are nowhere near as bad as their…
Logan Doe 893 films
Millions of dollars spent on their budgets and marketing them to millions across the world, these movies (theatrical releases) became…
eunan nwachukwu 2,513 films
June Neng 407 films
This lists purpose is to provide hand-picked film suggestions by displaying similar films together in each and every row, of…
Justin LaLiberty 575 films
Unusually worded, florid rating reasons from MPAA/CARA. All rating descriptors are copied from filmratings.com
See notes for rating reasons.
Kevin Royal Johnson 3,249 films
A complete list of the films in John Grant's A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Film Noir: The Essential Reference Guide, an…
Aurora 3,351 films
A work in progress. Each movie is added to the list as it is first mentioned, later mentions are not…
Alec Novakow 7,307 films
Using HBO guides I was able to recreate a list of most of their scheduled movies. There's a few months…
Victor Mazza 3,327 films
I'm a HUGE fan of the Watchmojo Top 10 lists about movies. I thought it'd be a great thing to…