Jeremy Elmkies’s review published on Letterboxd:
Batman v Superman presents certain ideas and issues regarding superheroes in the world the likes of which never fully explored in a film. There is a new level of depth found here, as it deals with social and religious controversies in such new ways. The issues similarly found in previous superhero films such as Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Spider-Man 2, but it is done with such a level of nuance that leaves me absolutely astonished. These heroes are not perfect characters; they are flawed beings with deep psychological problems, and ones that this film analyzes greatly. What if Superman was not only looked down upon by people, but was also seen as a terrorist threat who should burn? What if Batman was driven so far past the line of good and bad that he no longer cares for the life of his enemies? These are just some of the new depths found in the film, but there is much more to be discovered.
Fans were initially skeptical about the announcement of Ben Affleck as Batman, feeling he was not fit to play The Caped Crusader. Not only did Affleck deliver, but he completely knocked it out of the park. It is safe to say that the character of Batman is in the right hands, as he not only fits the role of Bruce Wayne, but brings the necessary grit of Batman. Thankfully, Superman is also considerably stronger and more well-rounded. I found him to be more intriguing and layered, as Henry Cavill gave a great performance. The fight among Batman and Superman, although not too long, is a blast to watch. It was inevitable and it was done well. In fact, all the fights scenes are incredible, with outstanding combat and choreography. However, with Wonder Woman, she was a very exciting character to see battle, but sadly was not given enough character development to feel relevant to the film’s story. It honestly felt as if she was there to simply set up for sequels.
Another skepticism prior to release was the cinematography and color pallet. One of the biggest complaints for its predecessor, Man of Steel, was its constant feel of dread and lack of color. Batman v Superman thankfully made some changes to that, with some better lighting which made the film feel more enjoyable, while still maintaining its dark tone. The visuals are also spectacular, which is something known of director Zack Snyder. He is often referred to as one who focuses on style over substance, but the film seems to have a great balance of the two.
In regards to the negatives of the film, they are almost entirely in the last act. I felt as if some of the ideas that were handled strongly throughout the film were almost forgotten about in the climax, just to have a big blockbuster ending. Some of it is forgettable, and just considerably weaker in comparison to the lead up. It is a shame because it brought down such great quality from the rest of the movie. The ending itself isn’t exactly poor, but disappointing.
Overall, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is given a lot less credit than deserved. The third act may be weaker, and some scenes might be there just for sequels, but the level of depth and innovation put into this film is undeniable. That, along with great fight scenes, wonderful performances, and gorgeous visuals makes this one a worth watch. It sets a new standard for what comic book films can represent, and it is one that I feel will get more appreciated over time.