Here’s what I liked: it’s a catchy-premise movie, with a small cast and a small set; it doesn’t spend much time setting it all up, it just gets going; kudos on actually staying silent for most of it instead of wussing our after 20 minutes. And the things I didn’t care much for: it spends too much time on the premise and not enough time on everything else (the relationships, the symbols, the what’s-it-really-about); the incredibly generic gray reptiloid; the Mars Attacks thing. On paper, I should love this movie, but it didn’t quite click fully with me.
It's as good an action/sci-fi movie as has ever been made, and on top of it, it's a subversive, complex, yet highly entertaining examination of the cost of social order. It has held up beautifully over the past 15 years, and in retrospect, it's one of the best movies of the 1990s.
It's perfectly fine for a movie to have an elusive core, to not be about anything in particular. But when that is the case, it should at least populate the screen with enough varied ideas to invite engagement. The Master is a claustrophobic, one-track tale(?) and so the overwhelming emotions it invokes are befuddlement and, often, boredom.
The titular Master is very mildly based on Scientology's L. Ron Hubbard, and references that spell this out do the movie no favors,…